Thomas Markle Sr. is back in federal custody after a judge found that he violated the conditions of his release while awaiting proceedings on a child sexual abuse material charge.
Federal authorities allege that Markle, 82, cut off his court-ordered ankle monitor at approximately 1:45 a.m. First Assistant US Attorney Bill Essayli said prosecutors would seek to have him detained while the case continued.
Four days ago, a federal judge allowed Mr. Markle to remain out of custody pending trial. He was ordered to wear a location monitoring device. He allegedly cut the bracelet off at 1:45 a.m. last night. Release conditions are court orders, not suggestions. We are asking the court to revoke his release and detain him pending trial, and we will continue to prosecute this case to the fullest extent of the law.
— F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli (@USAttyEssayli) November 10, 2026
On 10 November, US Magistrate Judge Lindsay Griffin revoked Markle’s release and ordered him detained. In her written order, she also said his housing situation had become “untenable” and that suitable accommodation was unavailable.
Markle denied violating his release conditions during the hearing, according to court minutes obtained by USA Today. The judge nevertheless found that a violation had occurred.
Questions about his living arrangements
Markle, who had one leg amputated in the Philippines, was initially released following his 6 November court appearance under conditions that included home detention and electronic ankle monitoring on his remaining leg.
A US Marshals Service spokesperson said he was released into the care of his daughter Samantha Markle after his assisted living facility declined to take him back. The facility has not publicly explained its decision in the reporting cited. However, the safety of residents and visitors, including children, must remain a priority for any care facility.
The judge described Markle’s housing situation as “untenable” after he was reportedly released into Samantha’s care. Yet the order did not explain what made the arrangement unsuitable or what happened at the property before the monitor was removed.
Those details need clarification. Also, who was present when the device was removed, and what did authorities learn about the circumstances?
Related Stories
The charge against Markle
Federal prosecutors have charged Markle with one count involving possession of child sexual abuse material. The case centres on material allegedly found in two storage units he rented in the Los Angeles area.
The US Department of Justice says FBI agents seized approximately 78 items, including slides, film negatives and books containing suspected child sexual abuse material. Prosecutors allege that some images show Markle with underage girls.
Markle previously denied allegations involving child sexual abuse material. No plea was entered at his initial appearance. He has not been convicted.
A court-ordered psychiatric assessment of his competency to stand trial is also pending. That assessment concerns whether he can understand the proceedings and assist in his defence; it does not decide whether the criminal allegation is true.
Discover more from Feminegra
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
