Megyn Kelly thought she could take aim at Jemele Hill with insults about her looks. Instead, she reignited a feud that has simmered for years and ended up the target of a viral backlash. Hill’s sharp reply reminded viewers that she has long dealt with double standards in media, while Kelly continues to lean on racially charged commentary to stay relevant.
Old Tensions Between Hill and Kelly
This clash was not the first. In 2020, Kelly attacked Hill for supporting NASCAR driver Bubba Wallace after officials found a noose in his garage. The FBI later ruled the incident was not a hate crime, but Hill’s larger point was about NASCAR’s ties to the Confederate flag. Kelly accused Hill of unfairly smearing fans, while Hill brushed her off with sarcasm: “Let me go pray to white Jesus for Megyn Kelly.” That moment cemented their animosity and showed Kelly’s habit of punching at prominent Black women in public life.
Related Stories
Kelly Takes Shots and Hill Fires Back
The latest clash erupted when Megyn Kelly used a segment on the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk to take aim at Jemele Hill’s appearance instead of her commentary.
“Okay, first of all, a coat of mascara would be your friend. Woman to woman on television, you need a little work and you should have them back off the camera a little bit because you are not attractive enough to have that extreme close-up. You can’t both be ugly on the outside and the inside. You need to choose one.” – Megyn Kelly
Her words landed less as media critique and more as a personal assault, echoing the playground taunts long weaponized against black women. As a Black journalist, Hill carried the added weight of the insult, which reflected how media often judged women of color more for their looks than for the substance of their work.
Hill refused to let the insult define her, clapping back with the viral line: “This face card ain’t never been declined.” Social media erupted, mocking Kelly’s recycling of beauty attacks while sidelining Hill’s original commentary. By day’s end, Kelly’s jab had sparked broader conversations about how Black women in media are often judged on appearance rather than substance.
A Long Pattern of Targeting Black Women
Kelly’s fixation on Hill fits a larger pattern. She has previously mocked Joy Reid’s hair, dismissed Tiffany Cross as unqualified, and taken jabs at Kamala Harris and Jasmine Crockett. And let’s not forget her wild rants aimed at Beyoncé and Meghan Sussex. Each time, the theme is familiar: reduce accomplished Black women to stereotypes about appearance, attitude, or tone.
Her own controversies form a backdrop. Kelly once defended blackface on air and infamously declared that “Santa Claus is white.” These moments reflect why her digs land as more than personal feuds. They are reminders of the way white women in media often weaponize beauty standards and cultural codes against women of color.
Final Thoughts
This latest clash between Hill and Kelly was about more than mascara or petty jabs. Hill spotlighted how media constantly forces Black women to defend their credibility while attacking their appearance. With figures like Laura Loomer launching racist tirades against politicians such as Jasmine Crockett, and Kelly’s ongoing fixation with denigrating the looks of Black women, the pattern is undeniable.
Women across industries are actively embracing makeup-free movements, insisting they be judged for their character and work rather than appearance. Yet Kelly and others continue pushing misogynistic critiques that actively keep women — especially Black women — pushed down. Hill’s rebuttal resonated because it wasn’t just witty; it underscored her clarity, humor, and resilience in the face of tired attacks.
Discover more from Feminegra
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
