James Gunn’s Superman reboot opens in theaters on July 11, 2025, but it has already triggered outrage from right-wing pundits before the first screening. His crime was telling the truth. James Gunn reminded the press that Kal-El is a refugee, sent from a dying planet, raised in Kansas, shaped by two worlds. Fox News and MAGA pundits didn’t just reject the message; they called it political kryptonite. Their outrage isn’t about Superman. It’s about a movement terrified of a hero who embraces immigrants as part of the American story.

Immigrant Roots Define Superman

Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster created Superman in the mid-1930s and published his debut in 1938, as fascism was rising in Europe. Both men were Jewish sons of immigrants who understood the fear of exile. They imagined a child rocketed from a dying planet and adopted by farmers who teach him kindness and civic duty. Every classic issue circles that origin. Clark Kent hides alien strength in Daily Planet hallways, striving to fit in yet protect the vulnerable. Comics historians have traced these parallels for decades. Modern arcs such as American Alien and Up in the Sky keep the theme explicit. The new film’s emphasis on humility and belonging continues a line that runs from the Great Depression through every major reboot.

  • A side-by-side image showing conservative outrage and fan support over Superman being described as an immigrant. On the left, a tweet from @EndWokeness criticizes James Gunn’s comment that Superman represents “basic human kindness.” On the right, a graphic featuring Superman’s logo reads: “I cannot wait to watch an illegal alien absolutely ruin the plans of a billionaire.”
  • Side-by-side image showing a tweet by Stephen L. Miller rejecting Superman’s immigrant status, and a meme of Clark Kent calling himself an illegal immigrant in a Smallville scene with his adoptive mother.

Revisionist Rage Fuels Maga Backlash

Conservative commentators insist they only want escapism, yet they jeer at any reminder that Superman embodies the immigrant dream. Kellyanne Conway told viewers, “We don’t buy tickets to hear ideology.” Dean Cain warned that message movies flop.

Social feeds lit up with claims that Gunn hijacked a patriotic icon. The same critics often deny real-world bias in housing, voting, or policing. Their sudden discomfort with Krypton’s last son rings hollow because the text never hid his status. Fan pages display panels where Superman helps undocumented workers and calls Earth a nation of migrants. MAGA outrage tries to erase that record to defend a narrow vision of American identity.

Gunn Revives The Original Ideal

Rather than lecture, Gunn crafts set pieces that ground heroism in empathy. Preview screenings and early reactions praise Gunn’s approach to grounding heroism in empathy, with one widely discussed scene showing Lois and Clark debating the cost of power. The director says the film centers “basic human kindness,” a value he believes the culture risks losing. His brother Sean Gunn put it bluntly on the red carpet: opposing immigrants betrays American values.

Box office forecasts predict a $135 million domestic opening despite boycott hashtags. Audience polling shows younger viewers welcome the immigrant lens and see no clash between it and patriotism. Critics from Arc Digital to the Jerusalem Post note that kindness, not border fear, drives the plot.

Superman’s cape never belonged to one party. It symbolized hope for every newcomer who builds a life in unfamiliar soil. When right-wing commentators rage at that legacy they reveal insecurity, not insight. Gunn’s film does not change the myth. It simply tells the truth already printed in eighty-six years of panels. Viewers who accept that truth may find the kindness the director champions. Those who reject it will keep shouting at a hero who has never stopped welcoming strangers.


Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.