While the royal press works overtime to polish the monarchy’s image, Prince Harry has exposed a truth they can’t spin: King Charles won’t speak to him, even as the media claims he’s eager to connect with his mixed-race grandchildren. Royal aides and media allies have pushed the monarchy as a symbol of quiet dignity and modern progress for years, but that image hides a long record of racial insensitivity and imperial entitlement.

King Charles now leads the Commonwealth, an alliance of 56 nations, 48 of which are majority Black or Brown. That’s over 85% of the bloc. Yet the institution he represents was built on colonization, and he continues to benefit from its legacy without reckoning with its harm. His personal actions, dismissive comments, and calculated silences raise urgent questions about whether he has the moral legitimacy to represent such a diverse global body. From refusing to protect his biracial grandchildren to ignoring the racist abuse endured by his daughter-in-law, Meghan Sussex, Charles’s failures are not just personal—they are institutional. They reveal a monarchy unwilling to confront its own legacy of exclusion and harm.

Related | King Charles Weaponized Security to Punish Prince Harry

King Charles Has a Documented Pattern of Racist Remarks and Racial Silence

The most damning moment came when Meghan and Harry revealed that a senior royal questioned how dark Archie’s skin would be. Reports later identified Charles and Kate as the likely sources. Charles never denied the allegation, nor did he defend his biracial grandson, whom he tried to strip of a royal title and later refused security. BBC radio host Danny Baker fueled the racism by tweeting an image comparing Archie to a chimpanzee, while tabloid columnists mocked Meghan as the “banana baroness” and likened her to a monkey. These dehumanizing attacks reflect the same white supremacist framing the monarchy has consistently failed to challenge.

Charles Said She Didn’t Look British

When Charles told British-Guyanese journalist Anita Sethi that she didn’t “look like she was from Manchester,” the comment echoed an all-too-familiar belief that whiteness defines Britishness. It happened at a Commonwealth forum, making the insult sharper. Sethi later wrote that anyone who thinks like that should not lead a diverse organization like the Commonwealth.

That wasn’t an isolated incident. Journalist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown shared how the royal family reacted with outrage to Princess Diana’s relationships with men of color, revealing a long-standing discomfort with interracial unions. These are not rumors, they are patterns.

The Royals Couldn’t Handle Diana’s Brown Lovers

Alibhai-Brown’s account of the royal family’s outrage over Princess Diana’s relationships with two non-white men is further supported by none other than Piers Morgan. In a rare moment of candor, Morgan speculated that the British establishment could not tolerate the idea of Diana marrying and possibly becoming pregnant by Dodi Fayed, a Muslim man. He framed her as a threat, not just because of who she loved, but because she dared to challenge the system’s moral authority. According to Morgan, Diana once told him, “I’m trouble to them. I won’t go away. I won’t go quiet.” That sentiment now echoes through Meghan Sussex’s treatment, suggesting that when women of color, or women aligned with non-white partners, assert themselves in royal spaces, they are swiftly marked as threats to be silenced or sidelined.

Piers Morgan made these remarks in the documentary Diana: The Last Days of a Princess, reflecting on the British establishment’s discomfort with her relationship with Dodi Fayed and growing defiance.

Charles Disrespects Cultures He Claims to Represent

Footage from Canada captured King Charles and Queen Camilla laughing during a ceremonial throat-singing performance by Inuit women in 2017. That moment, dismissed by royalists as trivial, deeply offended Indigenous observers whose traditions were once threatened by British imperial policy.

Charles’s discomfort around nonwhite cultures appears to extend beyond Canada. Royal biographer Tom Bower said Charles “never liked going to Africa” and avoided it when he could. He preferred “white Commonwealth” countries and showed more interest in India than African nations. While serving as a symbolic leader of 2.5 billion people, he deliberately chose which nations mattered more.

Kate Middleton, the future Queen, has spent 14 years in the royal family without visiting a single one of the 19 African Commonwealth nations. That omission isn’t accidental; it reflects the monarchy’s ongoing neglect of the very countries it claims a divine right to lead under the guise of royal supremacy. While she is celebrated as a modern royal, her record suggests otherwise. In Spare, Prince Harry reveals that he and Meghan proposed relocating to a Commonwealth country to continue serving the Crown. But once the plan was leaked to the press, the narrative twisted, portraying it as Kate’s idea to exile them to Africa, as if sending a biracial couple to the continent was a fitting punishment for seeking independence.

Charles Has Repeated His Racial Bias for Years—and the Record Shows It

After Queen Elizabeth died, mourners came to show their respect. Yet footage shows King Charles walking a line of people, smiling and shaking hands, until he reaches the only Black man. He skips him entirely, then continues as if nothing happened. That moment wasn’t just awkward. It was revealing. It showed the kind of instinctual avoidance that comes from years of racism, not accident.

During a 2023 visit to Metropolitan Police headquarters, Charles praised British officers for their “bravery” in confronting public unrest. He applauded their actions, labeled protesters as criminals, and endorsed the state’s heavy-handed response, despite growing concerns over police violence and racial bias. But when it comes to racially motivated violence or police brutality against Black Britons, he says nothing. He offers no condemnation, no solidarity, no words of support. His silence speaks volumes.

Inside his own household, racism wasn’t just tolerated, it was embedded. In 2001, Elizabeth Burgess, a Black woman who served as Charles’s secretary, resigned after years of racist and sexist abuse. She reported being called slurs by a valet, mocked with “black jokes,” and working in an environment that rejected any effort to promote diversity. “They wanted a white face,” she later said, describing the toxic culture under Charles’s leadership.

These aren’t isolated incidents. They form a consistent pattern. Whether on camera, in palace halls, or on the national stage, Charles shows who he chooses to acknowledge and who he does not.

The Monarchy Is Complicit in Media Abuse

In 2016, Prince Harry released a rare public statement defending Meghan Sussex from racist abuse. That statement has now been quietly deleted from the royal website, a calculated move in a wider palace strategy to deny and erase their role in enabling that abuse. These are the same palace sources still leaking to the press in an ongoing effort to discredit Harry and control the narrative.

King Charles Avoids His Grandkids But Craves Good Press

Back then, they claimed King Charles was speaking to Harry’s children via video call. But let’s be honest: there’s no public proof he ever did. Charles skipped Lilibet’s first birthday party in the UK, despite receiving an invitation. William and Kate declined, and instead staged a public appearance in Cardiff with their children. That wasn’t just a scheduling conflict. It was a deliberate message, and one that, of course, was leaked to the press.

Embed from Getty Images

This is the same King Charles who, according to multiple reports, was the royal who questioned how dark Harry and Meghan’s child would be. That allegation has never been denied. So it tracks. Why would he show up for his mixed-race grandchildren if he was already uneasy about their existence?

Now, amid his cancer diagnosis, Charles seeks public sympathy. Palace sources push stories casting him as a devoted grandfather who finds video calls with Archie and Lilibet insufficient. But Prince Harry has confirmed those calls don’t happen. The narrative doesn’t match reality. But actions speak louder than headlines. He denied security to Harry’s family, he stood by as Meghan was torn apart and he erased Harry’s words and refused to stand up for his own blood. This is not a family man. It’s a monarch protecting power over people—and white image over truth.

A collage of headlines from Daily Mail, Mirror, and InStyle showing King Charles expressing regret about not seeing Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s children, Archie and Lilibet, despite past reports of royal family rejection and absence from Lilibet’s birthday.
King Charles claims he wants a relationship with Archie and Lilibet, after ignoring invitations, skipping birthdays, and staying silent on racist abuse. The PR doesn’t match the history.

Related | Jamaica and Grenada Intensify Pressure on the Monarchy and Demand Reparations

The Commonwealth Deserves Better Leadership

As head of the Commonwealth, Charles represents dozens of nations shaped by colonial violence. Many of those countries are demanding reparations, justice, and dignity. Yet during his 2019 Caribbean tour, Charles chose to lay wreaths and give speeches instead of addressing slavery’s legacy or Britain’s role in it. Barbados even had to subsidize the cost of the royal visit.

The royal family continues to exploit former colonies while offering symbolic performances of unity. Scholars like Nalini Mohabir argue that Caribbean nations should stop welcoming royal tours until the UK answers CARICOM’s reparation demands. The time for ceremonial smiles is over.

The reality is simple. King Charles has never truly embraced the diversity of the Commonwealth. His public remarks, private decisions, and political alliances reveal a monarch who is out of touch with the modern world and unfit to represent it. The Commonwealth deserves a leader who respects its people, not one who performs for the press. It’s time to stop mistaking ceremony for change. It’s also time to stop ignoring the racism.

Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.