Buckingham Palace says it feels “saddened and perplexed” by Prince Harry’s claim that aides are sabotaging his reconciliation with King Charles. But the question remains: who is really doing the sabotaging?

“Recent reporting of the duke’s view of the tone of the meeting, is categorically false. The quotes attributed to him are pure invention — fed, one can only assume, by sources intent on sabotaging any reconciliation between father and son.” — Prince Harry’s spokesman.

“The palace has been left ‘saddened and perplexed’ by Prince Harry’s latest claim that the institution is ‘sabotaging’ the relationship with his father, the King. A royal source said: ‘The reality is that senior aides have been working behind the scenes to improve what is a delicate but important private family relationship.’” — The Times

Palace Briefings Against Harry

The royals have long painted Harry as the leaker when that is not true. It was palace aides who fed the press details of the Clarence House meeting — from the “official visit” narrative to the hug, the gift, and even the family photograph. Harry only spoke when forced to set the record straight.

The hypocrisy is glaring. Charles’s office insists Harry must stay quiet because he “cannot be trusted.” At the same time, palace staff feeds the press details and then acts outraged when caught. The goal is clear: silence Harry so his story can be rewritten on their terms.

The Wasp and the Briefing Wars

Reporters like Tom Sykes have suggested Clive Alderton, Charles’s private secretary, is the “Wasp” Harry described in Spare. Alderton has a history of briefing against Harry and may be positioning himself for a role in William’s future court. The rota press can’t keep its story straight. One day, blame falls on Charles’s aides, the next on Harry himself. In reality, the leaks point to a deeper struggle: courtiers caught between Charles and William, each camp jostling for power in a fractured court.

Media Shields Charles and Blames Harry

The coverage of this latest clash tells its own story. Outlets from GB News to The Times framed the King as “saddened” or “perplexed,” painting Charles as the wounded father while recasting Harry as the problem. Page Six repeated palace talking points, calling the royal family “saddened and perplexed.” The Daily Mirror echoed the same script, insisting Charles felt “frustrated” by Harry’s remarks.

Headlines from The Mirror, Page Six, and The Times frame King Charles as “saddened” or “perplexed” over Prince Harry’s sabotage accusation, reflecting how the press shields Charles while casting Harry as the problem.
UK media paints Charles as “saddened” while casting Harry as the problem, ignoring palace leaks fueling the feud.

This is the media’s playbook. When palace aides leak, reporters treat the information as fact. When Harry corrects the record, they frame him as combative or untrustworthy. The spin is consistent: Charles is the victim, Harry the aggressor. But the record shows the leaks did not come from Harry’s office. They came from inside the palace walls.

By amplifying palace briefings and downplaying Harry’s response, the press once again shields the monarchy while throwing Harry under the bus. It is the same cycle that has followed him since he and Meghan stepped back — a cycle that depends on painting Charles as the long-suffering father rather than the man presiding over a household addicted to leaking.

Charles Knows This Game

Charles’s claim to be “perplexed” is absurd. In the 1990s, he employed Mark Bolland, an aide infamous for planting stories to rehabilitate Camilla at Harry’s expense. For Charles to act shocked now that his household still leaks insults the public’s intelligence.

The sabotage isn’t Harry speaking up. It’s the palace using the same tired playbook: leak, brief, blame Harry, and repeat. The only surprise is that anyone pretends to believe their outrage.


Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.