Meghan Sussex announced on March 13, 2025, that she would be launching a new podcast, Confessions of a Female Founder, in partnership with Lemonada Media. The podcast has not yet launched, but the announcement alone was enough for critics to accuse her of stealing the name from other creators. Some critics pointed to a YouTube video by business owner Kady Méite titled Confessions of a Female Founder and claimed Meghan had copied her. However, Méite’s YouTube channel is not called Confessions of a Female Founder—it is simply named Kady Méite. Despite this, critics quickly spread the false narrative.
Méite, however, immediately shut down the claims. In an interview with Yahoo Lifestyle, she explained that while she understood why people drew connections, she did not believe Meghan had copied her.
She believed Meghan had likely never seen her YouTube channel and felt flattered by the comparison. Méite also warned that the situation was turning into yet another excuse to drag a woman down and refused to take part in it.
Despite Méite’s clear statement, Meghan’s critics ignored her words and continued pushing the false narrative. The outrage showed their real intention was not to discuss originality but to attack Meghan at every opportunity.
Critics Repeatedly Use Businesses to Discredit Meghan
This pattern of manufactured outrage is nothing new. Meghan’s critics follow a predictable playbook, using every new project she announces as an opportunity to discredit her. When she revealed As Ever, her lifestyle brand, they quickly accused her of stealing the name from a New York-based clothing company. The claim made little sense—Meghan applied for the trademark in 2022, and “As Ever” is a common phrase with multiple registered trademarks across different industries. The New York-based company had never trademarked its name, meaning it had no legal claim. Yet, that did not stop critics and some media outlets from running with the false story, fueling a wave of unnecessary attacks.
Critics used the same tactics when Meghan announced she would be selling jam. Critics immediately claimed she was copying King Charles. The outrage was never about originality. It was about finding a new angle to attack Meghan, even when the accusations had no real basis. The Confessions of a Female Founder and As Ever criticisms prove how quickly misinformation spreads when it serves a negative agenda. Meghan’s critics ignore facts and keep pushing the same tired narratives, no matter how easily those claims fall apart.
Kady Méite’s Response Exposes Media Manipulation
Kady Méite’s response revealed how quickly the media and social media users try to turn women against each other. Méite refused to be used as a pawn and stood firm against the hate campaign.

This controversy reflects a larger problem. When Meghan announces something, critics look for another people to frame as the “original” creator” and use that person’s success as a tool to attack Meghan.
This pattern is not about originality or fairness. It is about undermining Meghan at every turn. The critics who push these narratives do not care about protecting small businesses. Their only goal is to create obstacles for Meghan and fuel negativity around her name.
Kady Méite Faces Backlash for Defending Meghan
Kady Méite did not expect to be dragged into controversy, but after she shut down the false claims that Meghan Sussex stole her YouTube video title, critics turned on her. Although Kady Méite made it clear that she does not believe Meghan copied her, social media users continue to attack her. Some accuse her of being “paid off,” while others push her to sue Meghan, ignoring her repeated dismissals of the claims.
The attacks against Méite quickly became more than just criticism. Some users made racist and Islamophobic remarks, mocking her hijab and making assumptions about her identity and beliefs. In one particularly disturbing comment, a critic suggested that Méite supports Meghan simply because she is a “minority woman” and “probably very woke.” They added that because Méite wears a hijab, “you can understand where she’s coming from,” implying that her defense of Meghan is based on identity rather than facts.

The hostility toward Méite mirrors a pattern seen before. When public figures refuse to join the anti-Meghan mob, they often become targets themselves. Online harassers follow a clear playbook—they attack, discredit, or dismiss anyone who defends Meghan, even when they present factual evidence. In Méite’s case, her identity as a Black Muslim woman made her an even bigger target for hate.
Her experience illustrates how Meghan’s critics are not simply concerned with accountability or originality. Instead, they use every opportunity to fuel outrage, even when the person they claim to support explicitly rejects their claims. The backlash against Méite proves that this was never about protecting creators—it was always about attacking Meghan at any cost. They have no problem sacrificing other Black women to push their agenda.
Meghan Continues to Build Despite the Hate
Meghan moves forward with her work despite the constant scrutiny. Her upcoming podcast, With Love, Meghan season renewal, and her philanthropic efforts show that she remains focused on creating something meaningful.
The real issue was never whether Meghan copied anyone. The real issue has always been control. Meghan’s critics want to dictate how she moves and what she builds. They will continue searching for ways to discredit her, but her success proves that their attempts will not stop her from moving forward.
Discover more from Feminegra
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

This entire scenario perfectly encapsulate the racism of Meghan haters. These white women chose a Black woman as their avatar and when she didn’t play along with them and affirm their racism, they turned on her.
Kady was right to shut down the nonsense claim..and she smart not to allow them to use her. Kudos to her for not allowing herself to be weaponized by bad faith actors.
The morons who allowed themselves to be used are now realizing that once their usefulness is over, the parasites move on to the net useful idio
Dam if she do, and Dam if she don’t
Juli, what would be the benefit to Meghan Sussex (or Harry) as a public figure to attract bad faith journalists, racists and trolls as fans and supporters?
If that was her goal, she would be Harry’s brother.
Totally agree with you Kady. We will support you