On June 21, Donald Trump ordered direct U.S. airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites—Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. This marked the first time American forces bombed Iranian territory. The attack followed a June 13 Israeli strike reportedly greenlit by Trump. Standing in the White House flanked by war-aligned officials like JD Vance and Marco Rubio, the former president boasted of a “spectacular success.” Moments later, he posted a U.S. flag on Truth Social, signaling celebration rather than restraint.

This isn’t just another chapter in Middle East conflict. It’s a new war—publicly declared and widely condemned. The United Nations Charter prohibits one nation from using force against another outside of self-defense. Trump’s strike violated that principle and reignited fears of a broader regional explosion.

Trump ordered airstrikes on 3 Iranian nuclear sites without congressional approval, sparking backlash over their unconstitutionality. Democrats condemned the move, while most Republicans backed him.

The United States Claims Peace but Wages War

Trump insists the attacks were designed to stop Iran’s nuclear program. Yet U.S. intelligence agencies say Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. In March, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard told the Senate that Iran had suspended its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and had not resumed it. That testimony didn’t fit the Trump administration’s narrative, so the White House leaned on her to walk it back just hours before the bombing. Gabbard’s reversal appeared on Twitter, citing “misinterpretation,” despite her clear earlier statements.

The speech Trump gave after the airstrikes echoed language from the Iraq War buildup. His rhetoric mirrored George W. Bush’s 2002 “Axis of Evil” claim, suggesting Iran poses a global threat despite lacking nuclear arms. These tactics are familiar. They rely on fear, not fact, to justify violence.

Intelligence agencies know this. So do historians. The 2003 invasion of Iraq was based on lies about weapons of mass destruction. That war killed hundreds of thousands and destabilized the region for decades. Today’s narrative follows the same path. The goal isn’t disarmament. It’s regime change.

Related | Trump’s Spokeswoman Says He Ended Six Wars? The Numbers Say Otherwise

Trump Has Endangered The Lives Of U.S. Troops And Destabilized The Region

Iran will not let this go unanswered. With over 40,000 U.S. troops stationed across West Asia and dozens of American bases nearby, Tehran has targets. From Bahrain and Qatar to Iraq and Syria, U.S. presence is visible and vulnerable. Iranian officials have already signaled their intent to retaliate. If they don’t, they risk looking weak. They also risk inviting more aggression.

History taught them what happens to countries that disarm. In 2003, Libya gave up its nuclear ambitions in exchange for diplomatic engagement. Eight years later, NATO bombed Libya and backed a war that ended with the execution of its leader, Muammar Gaddafi. Iran watched. So did North Korea. The latter developed nuclear weapons shortly after President Bush’s speech, a decision that has kept it free from U.S. invasion.

Trump’s strike may push Iran to do the same. If that happens, it won’t end with Tehran. Turkey, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia could follow. Nuclear proliferation would become harder to contain, and peace even further out of reach.

Wall Street Profits While Diplomacy Burns

Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reported that Trump waited until after U.S. markets closed to authorize the bombing. His reason wasn’t strategy—it was stability for Wall Street. The attack took place on a Saturday, avoiding weekday volatility and protecting investors. This war, like many before it, protects the interests of billionaires. It’s not about democracy or freedom. It’s about power.

In 2018, Trump tore up the Iran nuclear deal signed under Barack Obama. That agreement, backed by the UN and major world powers, kept Iran in check while easing sanctions. Trump’s exit destroyed diplomatic trust. Now, after this strike, no future talks can proceed in good faith, especially when Iranian negotiators from recent sessions are dead.

Trump has unleashed chaos in the name of peace. His actions may lead to another drawn-out war, with even higher stakes. Iran will respond. And what follows could redraw the political map of the region for decades.

Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.