The Guardian announced it will stop posting content on X, formerly known as Twitter, citing concerns about “toxic” content. The decision reflects worries over the platform’s rise in disturbing content, conspiracy theories, and extremist rhetoric.

Concerns Over Content and Political Influence

The Guardian stated that the “benefits of being on X are now outweighed by the negatives.” Under Elon Musk’s ownership, X has seen a notable rise in far-right conspiracy theories and racism, according to The Guardian. The newspaper argued that the platform’s influence on political discourse has become detrimental.

Katharine Viner, editor-in-chief of The Guardian, discouraged staff from embedding tweets. She highlighted that X had grown “less stable and less useful” for readers. The decision comes after months of observing shifts in the platform’s content moderation.

Elon Musk’s Role in Content Moderation

Critics claim Musk’s “hands-off” moderation policy has allowed hate speech and misinformation to flourish on X. Under Musk’s leadership, the platform reinstated controversial figures like Donald Trump and Andrew Tate. This decision led to a 20% drop in user engagement, as reported by Third-party analysts.

Supporters of The Guardian’s move argue that Musk’s actions have eroded trust in X. By stepping away, The Guardian aims to distance itself from what it deems a harmful environment. In addition to content moderation concerns, X recently implemented new terms requiring all legal disputes to be handled in courts in conservative-leaning Texas. This shift, highlighted by Don Lemon in his recent departure announcement, is viewed by some as an attempt to insulate X from litigation while potentially intimidating critics.

In his statement, Don Lemon emphasized his discontent with the platform’s direction, stating, “I once believed it was a place for honest debate and discussion, transparency, and free speech, but I now feel it does not serve that purpose.” His decision to leave reflects the growing discontent among media figures, who feel that X no longer supports meaningful discourse.

Supporters of The Guardian’s move to exit X echo these sentiments, arguing that Musk’s approach has eroded trust in the platform. The Guardian cited an increasingly “toxic” atmosphere filled with “far-right conspiracy theories and racism” as the primary reason for its departure. By stepping away, it aims to distance itself from what it views as a harmful and deteriorating environment for responsible journalism. This decision, coupled with figures like Don Lemon’s departure, underscores the mounting concern over X’s trajectory under Musk’s ownership.

Reactions Across the Political Spectrum

Left-leaning reactions have largely praised The Guardian for standing against toxic content. Many believe this step highlights the ethical responsibility of media outlets. However, right-leaning voices criticized the decision, framing it as an attempt to silence free speech. Centrist observers have noted that The Guardian’s departure reflects a broader debate. Social media platforms continue to grapple with content moderation and public accountability.


However, The Guardian has been criticized heavily for their reporting of the Gaza Genocide and their biased reporting regarding Israel’s culpability. The juxtaposition of The Daily Mail’s coverage, often derided for sensationalism, and The Guardian’s selective focus highlights a stark double standard. Imagine being outdone in coverage breadth by a publication frequently criticized for misinformation. It calls into question both outlets’ commitment to balanced reporting.

Impact on Media and Social Platforms

The Guardian’s departure adds to a trend of media outlets rethinking their engagement with social platforms. In recent years, several publications have scaled back or entirely quit platforms due to similar concerns. X’s influence on political and cultural narratives may diminish if more media organizations follow suit. Newer platforms like Bluesky and Mastodon have gained traction as traditional outlets move away. The Guardian plans to focus on other social platforms and strengthen its engagement with readers directly through its website and newsletters.

While leaving X, The Guardian assured readers they could still share its content on the platform. Journalists may continue using X for newsgathering and embedding content where necessary. The outlet emphasized using resources “to promote quality journalism elsewhere.” The Guardian’s decision underscores a broader media reckoning with social media’s power. As platforms evolve, so too does the relationship between media outlets and digital discourse.

Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.