Prince Harry’s departure from Sentebale sparked headlines around the world. But none stirred more confusion than a now-debunked claim made by a Lesotho royal figure who falsely presented himself as the brother of Prince Seeiso, Harry’s longtime cofounder. The bizarre twist, originally published by The Telegraph and later corrected, has raised serious questions about media credibility and the true forces behind the swirling controversy.
Misidentification Fuels Media Frenzy
Principal Chief Khoabane Theko, a high-ranking member of Lesotho’s College of Chiefs, appeared in a Telegraph article criticizing Prince Harry’s reduced presence at the charity he co-founded in 2006.
👑 EXCLUSIVE: Prince Harry ‘lost interest’ in African charity after marrying Meghanhttps://t.co/fsZ4s37PiE
— The Telegraph (@Telegraph) April 16, 2025
Theko suggested that Harry’s marriage and move to the United States had “killed the spirit” of Sentebale, and claimed Meghan had never visited Lesotho. The article introduced him as Prince Seeiso’s brother—a claim that carried weight and emotional charge.
However, the identity claim quickly unraveled. Us Weekly confirmed that Theko holds no familial ties to Seeiso and has no role at Sentebale. He is not a trustee, advisor, or official spokesperson. The Telegraph eventually corrected its report, stating that Theko is not Seeiso’s brother and has no connection to the charity’s operations. Despite this, his remarks had already fueled a narrative suggesting Prince Harry had abandoned the charity that helped define his early philanthropic career—implicating Meghan as the reason for his supposed withdrawal.

Related | ‘With Heavy Hearts’ Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso Resign From Sentebale
The Truth Behind the Headlines
Prince Harry’s role in Sentebale shifted gradually over the years, influenced by royal duties, fatherhood, and a global pandemic. After moving to the United States in 2020, his ability to travel to Southern Africa became more limited. Yet his most recent visit in 2024, where he appeared alongside King Letsie III and Queen Massenate, signaled enduring ties and local support. Images of Harry advocating for HIV prevention and youth empowerment contradict Theko’s portrait of detachment.
More tellingly, Prince Seeiso never echoed Theko’s criticism. In fact, he remained publicly supportive of Harry, even during periods of reduced activity. The two stepped down together from Sentebale’s board in March 2025, amid broader governance issues and internal conflict with chair Sophie Chandauka. Their joint exit, coupled with a wave of trustee resignations, triggered a Charity Commission investigation that both sides welcomed.
That broader context was largely missing from early reporting. Instead, the focus turned to Harry’s perceived absence and Theko’s misleading commentary.
Now, as the charity faces regulatory review and a reexamination of its leadership, the damage from false reporting lingers. The media misrepresented a false source as a family insider, spreading misinformation that unfairly questioned Prince Harry’s commitment and distorted public perception. The timing and tone suggest this may not have been a simple error—but part of a broader effort to undermine both Harry and Meghan, especially in areas where their philanthropic work threatens to eclipse the monarchy’s own.
Discover more from Feminegra
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The British media’s aim is to continue to try to soil Harry and Meghan’s characters at the detriment of their own reputation (and make money while doing it). And you know what, I don’t even think they care. I would like to think this was purposely done. The damage has already been done, very few people are going to go back and read that correction.
I fully agree this was purposely done..
This was 99.9% purposefully intended to disparage the great work of Sentebale. Notice how Meghan’s name was dragged into a charity founded by two amazing Princes as a tribute to THEIR mother’s legacy. Notice how “The Telegraph” failed to apologize or say “sorry” to those they affected – including Prince Seeiso, Prince Harry, and Meghan. The Telegraph is obviously “happy” to correct mistakes that Google would have resolved. And notice how the correction by the UK media is always more quieter than their falsehood banner headlines.