Over the weekend, Prince William marked U.K. Mother’s Day by sharing a childhood photo of himself with Princess Diana. The image, taken at Highgrove in 1984, shows two-year-old William holding Diana’s hand in a field of flowers. On Instagram, William wrote: “Remembering my mother, today and every day. Thinking of all those who are remembering someone they love today. Happy Mother’s Day.”
That’s lovely. Diana remains deeply beloved, and people still feel protective of her legacy nearly three decades after her death.
But here’s the thing: Mother’s Day is also about living mothers. And William’s wife, the mother of his three children, didn’t get a mention.
No Birthday Tribute, No Mother’s Day Post
It did not go unnoticed that something was awkward about William’s Mother’s Day tribute. This isn’t the first time Kate Middleton has been conspicuously absent from her husband’s public acknowledgments.
Earlier this year, William also skipped a birthday tribute to Kate. Now Mother’s Day has come and gone without a public message to the woman raising his children.
Meanwhile, the post he did share focused entirely on his own grief. To the uninitiated, that pattern is starting to look like a strategy. William’s social media team is perfectly capable of posting tributes when they want to. When something isn’t posted, it’s usually because someone decided not to. And the optics are… not great.
The Diana Narrative Returns
William’s caption centered on remembering Diana, something he does regularly on major anniversaries. But the post also revived an awkward moment from the recent past. In July 2021, while responding to the findings of the Dyson report into the BBC’s Panorama interview with Diana, Prince William said his mother had become “paranoid” about the press during the final years of her life. The remark drew criticism at the time because many observers felt it echoed the same narrative that had long been used to undermine Diana’s warnings about media harassment.
In that statement, Prince William said, “It brings indescribable sadness to know that the BBC’s failures contributed significantly to her fear, paranoia and isolation that I remember from those final years with her.”
Prince Harry later pushed back strongly on that characterization, saying his mother had been absolutely right about the threats and media harassment surrounding her. He once said, “The tabloid press very much enjoy painting her as paranoid but she wasn’t paranoid. She was absolutely right about what was happening to her.”
That quote tends to resurface whenever Diana becomes part of a royal PR moment. Because for many observers, the contrast is hard to ignore. The same mother William once suggested was overly suspicious is now regularly invoked during public messaging campaigns.
EXCL: “When you’re vindicated, it proves you weren’t being paranoid”
— Rebecca Barry (@BeccaBarry) July 24, 2024
Prince Harry tells me he experienced the same paranoia as his mother Princess Diana.
Our exclusive interview features in Tabloids on Trial on ITV1 at 9pm on Thursday pic.twitter.com/hqkk9Or21h
The Ghost of the Photoshop Scandal
And then there’s the lingering Mother’s Day controversy from 2024. That year, Kensington Palace released a photo of Kate sitting with Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis. Within hours, major news agencies issued what’s known as a “photo kill” after spotting obvious editing inconsistencies — misaligned sleeves, blurred areas and strange hand positioning.
The Associated Press pulled the image, citing manipulation concerns. Kate later issued a brief apology, saying she sometimes experimented with editing as an amateur photographer.
The moment turned into a global embarrassment for the palace and badly damaged trust in royal images. So when another Mother’s Day passes without a new family post, people notice.

The Timing Is Interesting
All of this is happening while the royal family faces renewed scrutiny over connections to Jeffrey Epstein through various charities and donors linked to royal initiatives.
Prince William’s charity network has also faced scrutiny in recent weeks following the release of additional Epstein files. The Earthshot Prize, founded by William, counts Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem of DP World as a major donor. Bin Sulayem exchanged emails with Jeffrey Epstein in 2009 while Epstein was in prison for prostitution offences, including one message referencing a “torture video.” Meanwhile, the wildlife charity WildAid, where William served as an ambassador, accepted a $50,000 donation from Epstein’s foundation in 2013, five years after his conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor. At the Royal Marsden Cancer Charity, where William and Kate Middleton became joint patrons in 2025, trustee Nicole Junkermann resigned after emails surfaced showing she had previously communicated with Epstein.
None of these stories directly involves William personally. But they add to the broader atmosphere of scrutiny surrounding royal institutions right now. Which makes the Mother’s Day post feel… carefully timed.
Related Stories
The Bigger Question
There’s nothing wrong with remembering Princess Diana. Millions of people still do.
But when a husband publicly celebrates his mother on Mother’s Day while skipping any acknowledgment of the mother of his own children, people are going to talk.
And right now, they are. From the outside, the pattern looks strange: no birthday post, no Mother’s Day tribute for his wife, just another carefully curated throwback image of Diana. If the goal was to generate sympathy, it may not be landing the way William’s team expected, because the public is still asking the same question: “What did you know about Epstein?”
You’re Part of What Makes Feminegra Possible
Thousands of readers visit Feminegra every month to read cultural analysis, media criticism, and investigative stories.
But independent journalism only works when readers help sustain it.
If you believe in bold storytelling and holding powerful institutions accountable, consider becoming a supporter.
Your contribution helps us publish more fearless reporting.
Discover more from Feminegra
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Feminegra’s brilliance in chronicling trending news events, etcetera, backed up by careful research, skillfully written with professional flair, much appreciated and to be celebrated, for its uniqueness. Many thanks.
The mother’s day social media post, purportedly from William is clearly the brainchild of a PR advisor.
A middle aged man with a superiority complex,
given to frequent outbursts of incandescent rage, self confessed lack of composure, reverting back to early years imagery as a toddler with his late mother, invokes arrested development, needing therapeutic intervention and support from mental health professionals.
Honestly I highly doubt William and Kate are even told what is posted to their Instagram. This post to me feels like part of the charm offensive KP is undertaking with William and Kate right now in light of the beating the monarchy is taking because of Andrew. This post is about loss. Notice he says he’s thinking of his mother and “all those who are remembering someone they love today.” Mother’s Day is dreaded by a LOT of people–those who have lost their mothers, mothers who have lost children, women who are childless not by choice, those who have abusive mothers, etc. I think KP was quite smart to make a post for those people this year. They can do a William & Kate post anytime, but by releasing a never before seen photo of Diana they’re ensuring the post gets attention it wouldn’t otherwise, and they’re reminding us that William is beloved Diana’s son. There are rumors Harry & Meghan plan to do a Diana doc for the 30th anniversary of her death next year and if that’s true William will be aligning himself frequently with his mother until then, but I really think this time it’s about trying to look as compassionate as possible (as different from Andrew as possible). What investigators are uncovering about Andrew is going to be a massive story that does immense damage to the monarchy (read Entitled–your jaw will drop!), so we can expect to see a full KP charm offensive in the meantime (i.e. more engagements for W&K, more excuses to get Kate dolled up and in front of the camera, etc). Poor work-shy Willy and Duchess Dolittle have to get out there and werk! 😉
William ditched Kate in 2004 and again in 2007, shouting gleefully to his club mates “I’m free! Drink the menu” before several times propositioning beautiful aristocrat Isabella Calthorpe from a family close to the royals no doubt being aware of Camilla’s prescience that royalty marrying a working class girl would not work out.
“He had fallen for her in a huge way and wanted to be with her” it was known. He propositioned her several times that summer and although Isabella was single, she knocked William back and he then reconnected to second best, Kate Middleton.
William again was rumoured to have had an affair with Rose Hanbury, the Marchioness of Cholmondely, when Kate was birthing Prince Louis. Not the sort of constancy that remembers his second choice’s birthday or mother’s day yet the royal narrative describes an idyllic marriage.
“Keep your eyes wide open before marriage, half shut afterwards” Benjamin Franklin