Lizzo Scores Another Legal Victory as Judge Dismisses Stylist’s Remaining Claims

A federal judge has dismissed the remaining claims in a lawsuit brought by former wardrobe assistant Asha Daniels against Lizzo’s touring company, Big Grrrl Big Touring, ending the remaining claims in the nearly three-year federal case. Lizzo herself had already been dismissed as an individual defendant in 2024.

The ruling closes Daniels’ nearly three-year federal case at the district-court level, while separate litigation involving three former Lizzo dancers continues. The case was one of several legal challenges that placed intense scrutiny on the singer’s workplace culture and public image.

Lizzo reacted to the decision by saying she felt “relieved” and called the ruling another victory for herself and Big Grrrl Big Touring. She said she had refused to settle the case and would continue fighting what she called false claims against herself and her businesses.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Lizzo (@lizzobeeating)

What stands out in the reaction to this ruling is how quickly allegations can reshape a celebrity’s reputation long before a court reaches the end of the case. For years, accusations against Lizzo have shaped the public conversation about her character and career. Now, a judge has dismissed the remaining claims in this lawsuit, but the ruling is unlikely to attract anywhere near the attention the original allegations received.

The judge did not rule that every allegation Daniels made was fabricated. Instead, the court found that the evidence did not meet the legal standards required for her remaining discrimination, harassment and disability claims. In addressing some of the alleged workplace conduct, the judge said that even behaviour considered inappropriate or unprofessional did not necessarily rise to the level of an unlawful hostile work environment under Title VII.

At the same time, this case shows how much damage an accusation can do before a court ever reaches a final decision. The public judged Lizzo almost immediately, while the courts took years to work through the case. The accusations made major headlines. The dismissals have received far less attention. By then, the accusations had already damaged her reputation.

There is also the cost of having to defend yourself for years. Legal fees can be huge, but the bigger loss can be work, opportunities and public support. Even when a court dismisses claims, Lizzo cannot simply recover the opportunities, support and reputation she may have lost along the way. People have every right to make allegations, but the public should wait for the evidence before treating those allegations as established facts. Lizzo deserved the same chance to defend herself that any accused person should have.

That is what makes this ruling significant beyond the courtroom. Lizzo had to live with some of the most damaging accusations attached to her name for years, while the legal process moved far more slowly than the news cycle that judged her. Even now, the dismissal is unlikely to receive anything close to the attention the original allegations generated. That imbalance is one of the ugliest features of celebrity scandal culture: accusations can become permanently attached to someone’s identity, while later developments that complicate or weaken those claims struggle to travel nearly as far.