King Charles gathered some of the most powerful people in artificial intelligence at Dumfries House in Ayrshire on Thursday to warn that humanity must keep control of the technology before it becomes too late.

Executives from Nvidia, OpenAI, Google DeepMind and Anthropic attended the summit, where Charles warned about the “existential dangers” of AI and said the technology must remain “firmly in the service of humanity.”  

It sounds suitably grave. It also sounds remarkably familiar. Charles has no scientific, mathematical or professional technology background. He is not an AI researcher, programmer or regulator. His contribution here is essentially to convene people who actually understand the technology and deliver a moral warning about where it is heading.

There is nothing inherently wrong with hosting experts. But calling Charles a leading voice on artificial intelligence ignores the stronger positions others, including his own son, took before this royal summit.

Harry and Meghan Went Further Than Asking Silicon Valley for Reassurance

Prince Harry and Meghan Sussex already put their names behind a much harder position on artificial intelligence.

In March 2026, Harry and Meghan backed the Future of Life Institute’s Statement on Superintelligence, which calls for a ban on developing superintelligent AI until scientists broadly agree it can be built and controlled safely and the public supports it.

That is considerably more concrete than gathering technology executives and asking them to reassure everybody that they will keep their own inventions under control.

Harry and Meghan joined AI pioneers including Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, alongside technology and public figures from across the political spectrum. The statement is not anti-technology. It draws a line at developing systems more intelligent than humans before anyone can demonstrate that humanity will remain in control.

And Harry’s argument was strikingly similar to the language Charles is now using: AI should serve humanity rather than replace it.

So when Charles tells an audience four months later that AI must remain “in the service of humanity,” it is difficult not to notice the overlap.

There is no evidence Charles literally copied Harry and Meghan. But his intervention arrives after they publicly backed a stronger version of essentially the same warning.

Pope Leo Was Even Less Interested in Silicon Valley Reassurance

Then there is Pope Leo XIV. His May 2026 encyclical Magnifica Humanitas devoted extensive attention to artificial intelligence and went much further than Charles’s appeal for responsible development.

Leo urged the world to “disarm” AI from the commercial, geopolitical and military competition driving the race for ever more powerful systems. He argued that regulation alone would not be enough if technology continued to concentrate power and dominate human decision-making.

That is a fundamentally tougher challenge to the technology industry. Charles is asking executives from the companies developing advanced AI to provide reassurance that they can keep it safe.

Leo is questioning whether society should allow those same companies to continue racing toward ever more powerful systems without much stronger limits. Harry and Meghan backed a prohibition on superintelligence until safety can actually be demonstrated. So Charles’s “intervention” feels far less pioneering than the Palace presentation might suggest.

Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.