Images of Kate Middleton seated beside Donald Trump at Windsor Castle spread quickly across social media, drawing praise from his supporters and criticism from voices on the Left. During the state banquet, the Princess of Wales smiled warmly at the former U.S. president. What might have been a routine seating plan instead turned into a debated royal moment of the year.

The Banquet Photo That Sparked Debate

Kate arrived wearing the historic Lover’s Knot Tiara and a gold lace gown. Many commentators linked her outfit to Trump’s taste for opulence. The seating plan placed her next to Trump, who once made crude remarks about her in a resurfaced 2012 tweet. He had urged photographers to profit from topless photos of her. That history made the banquet images even more jarring for many viewers.

Reaction online showed a sharp divide. Some users recoiled, calling the moment “ick” and voicing disappointment that Kate did not keep her distance. Others praised the photo. MAGA-aligned figures celebrated her poise, her style, and even described the image as radiating “aura.” Conservative commentators framed the moment as symbolic. Progressive voices argued it revealed political alignment.

Princess Kate wearing the Lover’s Knot Tiara sits next to former U.S. President Donald Trump at Windsor Castle during the state banquet, as social media debates their interaction.
This banquet photo of Kate and Trump ignited fierce debate, fueling accusations that the Princess of Wales is a Trumper.

Kate’s Public Image and Conservative Resonance

For years, the British press has cast Kate as the embodiment of tradition. Journalist Helen Lewis noted that before Harry’s relationship with Meghan Sussex, Kate was often painted as vulgar and bourgeois. She was accused of scheming to win William by attending St. Andrews. After Meghan entered the royal scene, coverage shifted. Kate was recast as the “English rose,” a vision of respectability less accessible to women of color.

Tabloid headlines about her [Kate] have become noticeably kinder since Harry’s relationship with Sussex was announced. She was once deemed vulgar and hopelessly bourgeois, a schemer who chose to study at the University of St Andrews in Scotland precisely to ensnare William. … This new valorization of Kate is racially inflected, because Britain’s most durable template of respectable womanhood—the ‘English rose’—is much less accessible to anyone foreign or dark-skinned.

That framing now intersects with American politics. MAGA supporters seized on Kate’s banquet moment, claiming she represents their values of traditional femininity and conservative respectability. Royal commentator Elizabeth Holmes argued that the seating reinforced her standing with Trump’s base. To critics, Kate appeared less a neutral figure bound by protocol and more a symbol whose image resonates with right-wing audiences.

Embed from Getty Images

Meghan Sussex as a Counterpoint

The comparisons with Meghan Sussex are inevitable. Meghan has a public record of advocacy for women’s rights and racial justice. She has spoken in support of Black Lives Matter and joined campaigns against racism and sexism. She has also championed girls’ education and partnered with the NAACP.

Kate, by contrast, has focused her work on childhood development, mental health, and family wellbeing. These causes are important but considered safe and non-political for royal women. Meghan has spoken openly about feminism, even writing at age 11 to protest sexist advertising. As Duchess of Sussex, she brought that activism into the royal spotlight.

Princess Diana also modeled progressive leadership. She shook hands with HIV/AIDS patients at the height of the epidemic, when stigma kept even many political leaders at a distance. Her actions showed a willingness to defy convention in ways Kate has avoided.

Final Thoughts

Kate Middleton’s seating beside Donald Trump may have followed protocol, but the optics carried far greater weight. Monarchists often argue that Britain needs the monarchy to avoid the chaos of a Trump-style presidency. Yet the images posed a blunt rebuttal: what does it mean when the monarchy embraces Trump?

For a future queen consort, the banquet moment carried an even sharper edge. Kate’s smiling ease beside one of the most polarizing men in modern politics read to many as deliberate “pick-me” behavior, undermining the neutrality the crown claims to uphold. The optics were especially fraught given Trump’s long history of derogatory remarks and allegations involving women—from the Access Hollywood tape to insults aimed at female rivals, crude comments urging paparazzi to profit from topless photos of Kate herself. And let’s not forget Donald Trump’s long association with the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Meanwhile, the press rushed to present the visit as a triumph for the monarchy. Royalists claimed the Sussexes were missing out. Critics, however, saw something different. The photographs left them asking whether Kate was performing her role as a dutiful royal or showing herself as a figure more aligned with Trumpism than with the progressive causes long championed by Diana and Meghan.

Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.