Just weeks after Meghan Sussex delivered a keynote address at the TIME100 Summit, the media is already framing the latest development as a Prince Harry and Meghan ‘snub’. TIME has named Prince William and Kate Middleton to its 2025 list of the most influential people in philanthropy, describing the couple as “innovators” for their work with the Royal Foundation and the Earthshot Prize. The twist? TIME left Harry and Meghan off the list, even after inviting Meghan to speak and despite their global impact—while the magazine’s owners maintain financial ties to the Wales’ Royal Foundation.

The message is clear: when it comes to influence, the Sussexes are the benchmark—but when it comes to recognition, there is an objective to erase them. The decision exposes serious questions about media favoritism, donor-driven editorial choices, and how far institutions will go to protect the illusion of royal relevance.

TIME100 List Leans On Connections Not Contributions

The TIME100 Philanthropy list features Prince William philanthropy efforts like the Earthshot Prize and Kate’s Shaping Us campaign. Earthshot offers awards to environmental projects, although its impact remains vague and heavily PR-driven. Kate’s early childhood initiative receives praise, focused on a task force report estimating that childcare investment could add £45.5 billion to the UK economy. Yet similar findings have long been published by experts, making the media’s framing of her role seem overstated.

What the TIME profile fails to mention is that the magazine’s owners, Marc and Lynne Benioff, are longtime supporters of the Royal Foundation. Their financial connection appears in Time’s article fine print. That disclosure makes the “innovation” label look less like earned praise and more like pay-to-play promotion. The conflict of interest undermines the credibility of the recognition and further exposes how elite networks influence media narratives.

Screenshot from TIME100 Philanthropy 2025 article showing a paragraph about Princess Catherine’s early childhood task force, with a highlighted disclosure at the bottom stating that TIME’s owners and co-chairs Marc and Lynne Benioff have supported the Royal Foundation.

Media outlets have framed Harry and Meghan’s absence as a snub, centering headlines not on the Waleses’ work but on the Sussexes’ exclusion. This has become a familiar pattern. The couple is constantly used as a counterpoint—praised when ignored, condemned when present. The media can’t stop invoking their names, even when pretending to move on.

Side-by-side image showing a Daily Mail headline reporting that Harry and Meghan didn’t make TIME100’s philanthropy list while William and Kate did, and a tweet from Cameron Walker highlighting the Wales as “innovators” with a subheadline noting Harry and Meghan were snubbed. The coverage emphasizes the contrast in media framing and recognition.

Related | Meghan Sussex Shines at the 2025 TIME100 Summit in New York

Harry And Meghan Snubbed Despite Consistent Leadership And Visibility

For those tracking actual philanthropic innovation, the omission is laughable. Harry and Meghan snubbed from the TIME100 philanthropy list just weeks after participating in the organization’s own summit is a contradiction that speaks volumes. Meghan was a keynote speaker in New York. The couple’s Archewell Foundation continues to fund community aid, vaccine access, digital safety, and mental health initiatives. Unlike their royal relatives, they operate without taxpayer money and still deliver results.

Embed from Getty Images

TIME excluded Meghan and Harry from a list curated under the oversight of owners with known ties to the Royal Foundation. It’s a sign that the old establishment still clings to influence it no longer earns. While the Waleses make headlines with vague campaigns and glossy PR, the Sussexes continue to show up in rooms that matter. Global forums like the TIME Summit and the UN have invited no other working royal to speak solo in recent years—except Meghan Sussex. No other royal is shaping tech safety policies with the White House or meeting youth leaders at the UN.

Yet again, the press tries to diminish their relevance by framing the absence as a loss. But the real loss is credibility—on TIME’s part, and on the part of the media outlets that need to prop up William and Kate by comparing them to Meghan and Harry. The Waleses can’t stand on their own, and the world knows it.


Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.