Graydon Carter, the former editor of Vanity Fair, is back in the headlines—not for journalism that holds power to account, but for recycling tired jabs at Meghan Sussex. Once seen as a gatekeeper of elite media, Carter now spends his energy lobbing insults at a woman who dared to walk away from their control. Worse still, this isn’t just petty. Carter has a documented history of protecting predators while undermining women. That hypocrisy deserves more than a headline—it deserves to be exposed.

The Vanity Fair Cover That Misled Meghan Sussex

When Meghan Sussex appeared on the cover of Vanity Fair in 2017, she expected the story to center on her philanthropy and charity work. That’s what she was told. But instead of highlighting her purpose and accomplishments, the magazine framed the entire feature around her relationship with Prince Harry. Meghan even asked the editor, “Is this going to be all about Prince Harry? Because I thought we were going to be talking about my charities and my philanthropy.”

Meghan Sussex on the October 2017 cover of Vanity Fair, close-up portrait with the headline "She’s Just Wild About Harry!"
Meghan Sussex appeared on this Vanity Fair cover expecting a story on her philanthropy—but the magazine focused on her relationship instead.

Rather than respecting her wishes or acknowledging her work, Graydon Carter and the magazine ran with the more sensational narrative. Later, Carter doubled down on the insult, calling her “adrift on facts and reality.” That wasn’t journalism. That was exploitation. Meghan didn’t walk into Vanity Fair looking for a royal spotlight. She wanted to talk about what matters to her—helping others. Instead, she became a headline, not a human being.

Graydon Carter crawling out of semi-retirement just to call Meghan and Harry ‘chancers‘ in a bid to sell his memoir? That’s not journalism. That’s an old boys’ club tantrum.

Related | Debunking Vanity Fair’s Misinformation About Meghan Markle and Prince Harry

Graydon Carter Protected Epstein and Buried Real Journalism

If Carter’s comments about Meghan weren’t offensive enough, let’s remember the facts. In 2003, journalist Vicky Ward tried to expose Jeffrey Epstein in Vanity Fair. She interviewed survivors. She had the evidence. But Carter cut the most damning parts of the story. Epstein even visited the Vanity Fair offices to pressure Carter directly. Not long after, someone left a dead cat on Carter’s lawn. He caved to intimidation and silenced survivors.

Kim Masters, another veteran journalist, confirmed that Carter had altered and cut her reporting too—often for reasons that had nothing to do with ethics or facts. This isn’t a coincidence. It’s a pattern.

Embed from Getty Images

Male Arrogance Drives These Narratives

Graydon Carter’s actions aren’t unique. They reflect a wider pattern of entitlement among powerful white men who control media narratives, often at the expense of women—especially Women of Color. This isn’t just about one editor. It’s about a system that rewards white male arrogance and punishes anyone who challenges it.

These men and their sexist women, expect to be heard, even when they speak from ignorance about racism, sexism, and the real experiences of people of color. Writer Afua Hirsch has shown how white-male arrogance dominates both British and American media. They gaslight Women of Color, dismiss systemic racism, and wrap their bias in the language of “objectivity.” But this isn’t about objectivity—it’s about control.

This culture doesn’t just live in headlines—it lives in who the media chooses to uplift. While Meghan Sussex is vilified for building a business, men like Laurence Fox are handed platforms despite appalling behavior. Laurence Fox, a media personality known for mocking women like Meghan Sussex and calling racism ‘boring.’ Now, he’s charged under the Sexual Offences Act for sharing an upskirting photo of Narinder Kaur. If convicted, he could face two years in prison and end up on the Sex Offenders Register.

This is the same Laurence Fox who once paraded around London in a MAGA hat, minimized racism, and lashed out at women pushing for basic respect. He also made disgusting comments about journalist Ava Evans live on GB News, while Dan Wootton smirked beside him. And who could forget Jeremy Clarkson’s hate-filled column in The Sun where he fantasized about Meghan being publicly humiliated?

What does it say about the media when men like this are handed platforms, treated as commentators, and allowed to spew hate without consequence—until the law steps in? This isn’t just about Fox. It’s about a culture that protects men like him until it’s too late.

Related | Harry’s Legal Fight Exposes Media’s Efforts to Undermine Him and Meghan

The Media Glorifies Predators While Punishing Meghan Sussex

Let’s compare how the press treated Meghan Sussex versus how they treated real scandals. Carter spiked Epstein stories. British tabloids bent over backwards to avoid asking Prince Andrew hard questions about his relationship with a convicted pedophile. Meanwhile, Meghan faced endless headlines over the most mundane such as making and selling jam.

Even when she shared a glimpse of her daughter online—without showing the child’s face—critics cried hypocrisy. But no one questions how other royal children are used for press and PR. Meghan is constantly judged for protecting her children, while others parade theirs for media campaigns. The difference? The Duchess of Sussex is a Mixed Race Black Woman who refuses to be controlled.

Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.