Encumene Aztec: Controversial New Game Sparks Debate Over Colonial History

Encumene Aztec is a third-person survival action RPG that has ignited heated debates even before its release. Set in 16th-century Mesoamerica, the game places players in the shoes of an Aztec warrior fighting against the Spanish conquistadors. While its premise offers an interesting historical narrative, the game has sparked a wave of controversy, especially on social media. With American conservatives praising colonialism and dismissing the horrors of the Spanish conquest, Encumene Aztec has become a flashpoint for discussions about historical misrepresentation and the glorification of colonial violence.

What is Encumene Aztec?

Encumene Aztec, developed by Giantscraft, is scheduled for a 2025 release. This third-person survival action RPG immerses players in the final days of the Aztec Empire, tasking them with defending their city against the invading Spanish conquistadors. Players can expect a rich narrative driven by historical events, with elements of gritty combat, stealth, and crafting. The RPG progression system promises an evolving storyline that adapts to the player’s choices, creating a dynamic experience that blends action with deeper cultural themes.

The game stands out with its inclusion of blood sacrifices, a controversial topic that could either highlight historical realism or perpetuate myths about the Aztec culture. In Encumene Aztec, players will need to balance combat strategies while managing resources to ensure their people’s survival. The emphasis on narrative and player agency shapes Encumene Aztec into both a historically inspired adventure and a challenging RPG experience. However, as more details emerge, questions about its cultural sensitivity are growing louder.

Related | ‘Black Legend’ Row Erupts After Trailer Shows Aztec Batman Battling Spanish Invaders

The Colonialism Debate

The announcement of Encumene Aztec sparked a fierce debate about colonialism and how video games portray history. American conservatives, in particular, have sparked controversy by celebrating the Spanish conquest as a “heroic” act. Figures like Matt Walsh have openly expressed their approval of colonization, with Walsh stating that Native Americans were “savages” who deserved to be conquered. Many social media users echoed this sentiment, even asking developers if they could play as the Spanish conquistadors rather than the Aztecs.

Matt Walsh went on a white supremacist rant about how the Spanish slaughtering tens of thousands of Indigenous people was good because they were a "morally inferior civilization".
He goes on to praise Hernán Cortés, a pedophile who raped multiple Indigenous slaves pic.twitter.com/qBBZO9qva5

— The Serfs (youtube.com/theserftimes) (@theserfstv) December 15, 2022

This viewpoint reveals a deeper issue: the glorification of colonialism. Supporters of this narrative argue that the conquest was a necessary step in history, painting the Spanish invaders as noble heroes. Such perspectives ignore the atrocities committed during colonization, from the enslavement of Indigenous peoples to the spread of deadly diseases that wiped out millions. By framing the Spanish conquest in a positive light, these arguments perpetuate dangerous myths and overlook the suffering experienced by the native populations. The controversy surrounding Encumene Aztec has highlighted the ongoing struggle over how history is represented, particularly when it involves colonization and its impact.

Related | Carole Malone’s Whitewashing Britain’s Brutal Past

Historical Misrepresentation and Myths

A major issue raised by the Encumene Aztec controversy is the persistent use of historical myths to justify colonial violence. Myths about the Aztecs, such as widespread claims of cannibalism and child sacrifice, have long been used to paint Indigenous peoples as “barbaric” or “uncivilized.” These exaggerated tales originated with the Spanish conquistadors themselves, who used such stories to dehumanize the Aztecs and justify their brutal campaign of conquest. Although elements of ritualized violence existed in Aztec society, colonizers have often inflated the extent of these practices to fit their narrative.

This historical distortion continues to shape public perceptions. Many of the game’s critics have defended the actions of the Spanish by pointing to these myths, claiming that the Aztecs deserved their fate because of their supposed brutality. Yet, these views ignore the larger context of Spanish colonization, which involved not only the destruction of the Aztec Empire but also the enslavement and exploitation of countless Indigenous peoples throughout the Americas. These myths persist in discussions about Encumene Aztec, reminding us how easily people can twist history to fit a particular agenda and why we must challenge such narratives.

Elon Musk’s Twitter and the Spread of Controversial Takes

Since Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter, the platform has seen an increase in the visibility of far-right viewpoints. Encumene Aztec became a battleground for these opinions, as many users expressed outrage over the game’s focus on Indigenous resistance. Calls to “play as the Spanish” filled the comment sections of gaming threads, with users defending the conquistadors and arguing that colonialism was beneficial. The game announcement’s reception on Twitter has laid bare the platform’s role in amplifying divisive and racist rhetoric.

I want to play as the conquistadors because they rallied the tribes against their Aztec oppressors and brought civilization to these child-murdering heathens.

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) May 31, 2023

Far-right users have taken advantage of the lack of checks on Twitter to voice their controversial takes. Many praised the Spanish for “bringing civilization” to the Americas, often using the game’s announcement as an excuse to criticize Indigenous cultures. The most extreme comments even invoked comparisons to European fascism, with some users showing support for the conquest’s methods of domination. This trend speaks to a broader issue of how historical narratives, when presented without context, can be co-opted by those looking to justify past atrocities. Musk’s hands-off approach to moderation has allowed these voices to dominate the conversation around Encumene Aztec, reflecting the growing problem of extremism on social media.

Will Encumene Aztec Do Justice to History?

With Encumene Aztec tackling such a controversial period in history, concerns about cultural sensitivity have arisen. Many wonder if the game will handle the subject matter with the care and nuance it deserves. While the idea of playing as an Aztec warrior resisting colonial invaders is compelling, some fear that the game may fall into the trap of reinforcing harmful stereotypes, particularly if it fails to involve Indigenous voices in the development process.

The game’s portrayal of Aztec culture, especially in relation to blood sacrifices, will be a key point of scrutiny. Some critics argue that focusing too heavily on this aspect of Aztec society could perpetuate long-debunked myths, while others believe that ignoring it would be historically inaccurate. The balance between realism and responsible representation is a delicate one, and developers need to ensure they are not reinforcing colonial narratives. People have praised games like Assassin’s Creed for their attention to historical detail and involvement of cultural consultants, setting a potential standard for Encumene Aztec to follo

Ultimately, whether Encumene Aztec succeeds in presenting a thoughtful and accurate portrayal of history will depend on its approach to storytelling and cultural consultation. If the developers involve Indigenous historians and strive for authenticity, the game could provide an important counter-narrative to the glorification of colonialism. However, without proper care, it risks becoming yet another piece of media that oversimplifies complex histories for entertainment.