The double standards are glaring. Meghan Sussex once wore earrings from the royal collection during a 2018 state dinner in Fiji. These earrings, originally gifted to Queen Elizabeth II by the Saudi royal family, were on loan to Meghan as part of standard royal practice. The British media implied Meghan bore moral complicity in the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi because they believed the earrings came from Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. She faced a coordinated smear campaign just days before her Oprah interview aired.

Fast forward to 2025. Prince William and Princess Kate were reportedly vacationing on the superyacht Opera, which is widely believed to be owned by Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed, the UAE’s foreign minister and a key figure in a regime with a record of human rights violations. There is no outcry, no tabloid rage, and no panel of commentators asking whether Kate Middleton condones state brutality. The hypocrisy speaks volumes.

Advertisement

The Media Smeared Meghan Over Jewelry She Did Not Own

In 2021, The Times and The Telegraph published pieces accusing Meghan of wearing earrings allegedly gifted by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. These stories emerged shortly before her Oprah interview with Prince Harry.

Though the earrings were part of the Queen’s collection and loaned to Meghan for official events, the media used the timing to cast her as indifferent to human rights abuses.

A Sussexes spokesperson formally rebutted the claim, clarifying that Meghan did not personally receive the earrings. The media ignored that fact. British commentators such as Andrew Neil (Mail columnist and Times Radio anchor), Chris Ship (ITV News royal editor), Andrew Pierce (Daily Mail consultant editor and GMB pundit), Kevin Maguire (journalist and political commentator), and Piers Morgan (former Good Morning Britain host and TalkTV anchor) used the jewelry controversy to reinforce a narrative that cast Meghan as calculating or indifferent to human rights concerns.

Queen Elizabeth and other royals, including Diana and Camilla, have worn jewels from Saudi Arabia for decades without facing similar scrutiny.

This level of coordinated outrage, timed just days before Meghan and Harry’s Oprah interview aired on March 7, 2021, felt particularly strategic given the gravity of what the Sussexes later revealed. In that interview, Meghan detailed her mental health struggles, the institution’s refusal to support her, and shocking claims about conversations concerning the skin tone of her unborn child. Harry spoke candidly about feeling trapped within the system and abandoned by his family.

Advertisement

So the media’s aggressive focus on earrings, paired with the palace’s silence on the couple’s deeper concerns, now appears less like journalism and more like preemptive damage control. It raises the question of whether the palace and parts of the press worked in tandem to discredit Meghan’s character before the public could hear the full extent of her allegations against both institutions.

William And Kate Face No Questions Over UAE Ties

This month, onlookers allegedly spotted William and Kate lounging on the superyacht Opera during their vacation in Kefalonia. Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed, the foreign minister of the United Arab Emirates and a senior figure in an authoritarian regime that jails dissidents and suppresses press freedom, owns the vessel.

There has been no widespread media commentary on their choice of holiday host. No one asked whether they were endorsing the UAE’s actions by accepting such luxurious hospitality. The same press that claimed Meghan’s earrings were symbolic of Saudi violence now protects William and Kate from similar association.

These omissions are not accidental. They reveal the political function of royal coverage in the UK. When Meghan challenges palace control, she becomes a target. When William and Kate lounge on yachts tied to controversial regimes, silence reigns. This isn’t just media bias. It is complicity.

The public deserves honest reporting, not weaponized outrage. Meghan was dragged for wearing earrings she did not own, at a time when the Crown still enjoyed close diplomatic ties with Saudi Arabia. William and Kate now accept private hospitality from one of the UAE’s most powerful figures and get a free press pass. The difference isn’t ethics. It’s whose image the British media wants to protect.

Advertisement

Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.