Angela Levin has made many criticisms and racist claims about the Sussexes over the years. Few have been as grave as this.

Appearing on TalkTV, Levin alleged that the couple had encountered Hamas-linked individuals during the visit to Jordan. Pressed by the host — “You’re saying that Meghan Markle’s hanging out with Hamas terrorists?” — Levin replied: “I’m not saying she’s hanging out with them, but some of the people who are running these events in Jordan are Hamas.”

That is not a throwaway line. Hamas is a proscribed terrorist organisation in the UK. Publicly linking named individuals to such a group without proof is a serious matter. It demands evidence. Levin did not cite any evidence that Harry and Meghan met members of a proscribed organisation.

Advertisement

A Humanitarian Visit Recast As A Security Scandal

The two-day trip by Prince Harry and Meghan Sussex, was undertaken at the invitation of the World Health Organization. The focus was medical evacuation and treatment for children affected by the war in Gaza, alongside Syrian refugees receiving care in Jordan.

The couple visited Amman Specialty Hospital, met young amputees evacuated from Gaza, and attended a site supported by World Central Kitchen following a $500,000 Archewell donation. Coverage from the Associated Press, CNN and People reported on the humanitarian dimension. None alleged contact with militants.

Levin’s claim appears to stem from an exposé by HonestReporting highlighting social media posts by some employees of the refugee NGO Questscope. The posts included pro-Hamas imagery. That is not the same as proving that staff are members of Hamas, nor that the Sussexes met militants, nor that the visit itself had any political objective.

Jordanian NGOs operate under national oversight, so claims of organisational ties to terrorism require serious proof. If there were active terrorist affiliations, that would be a matter for Jordanian authorities and international security agencies. It would not be unearthed via a television segment built on inference.

From Studio Speculation To Social Media Escalation

Levin doubled down on X, writing: “There were apparently several Hamas staff some in Hamas headbands. They are terrorists! The King and Prince William must do something sharpish.”

A Palestinian keffiyeh is a traditional dress. It is not, by default, a Hamas insignia. Conflating cultural attire with terrorism inflames rather than informs.

Her comments drew a swift response from Baroness Meral Hussein-Ece OBE, who called for evidence and stressed that the visit was organised by the World Health Organization and centred on treating children injured by war. The Sussexes’ charitable arm, now known as Archewell Philanthropies, funded medical evacuation efforts. There is no indication of UK taxpayer funding or official royal endorsement.

Nile Gardiner, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, amplified Levin’s claims online and questioned the Sussexes’ funding and use of royal titles. He has previously led efforts to challenge Prince Harry’s U.S. visa status, underscoring his long-standing critical stance toward the couple. His intervention reflects that established opposition, not evidence of any extremist contact.

Reckless Words In A Volatile Climate

Levin questioned how Meghan and Harry knew who they were meeting. A more pressing question is how she claims insight into their itinerary. The couple were invited by the World Health Organization. Their visit supported the charitable work they fund. It was not an official royal tour.

Grave claims demand proof, not suggestion, not television theatrics, not social media momentum.

When commentators imply links to terrorism without clear evidence, they step beyond scrutiny and into dangerous recklessness.

Advertisement

Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.