William and Kate Heckled Over Andrew and Epstein During Scotland Visit as Police Step In

Prince William and Kate Middleton did not expect to be heckled on a routine visit to Scotland. On January 20, protesters cut through the security cordon and directed pointed questions at Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein. The exchange was sharp and public, yet major news outlets moved quickly past it. A moment that laid bare public anger was softened, shortened, or sidelined altogether.

What Happened in Scotland

The confrontation unfolded as Prince William arrived with Kate Middleton for a public engagement. From across the road, a protester shouted questions about Andrew’s ties to Epstein and demanded answers. Police moved quickly, citing children nearby, while bystanders shouted back at the heckler. The exchange turned tense and unmistakable.

It was not the welcome they expected, as Prince William and Kate Middleton were challenged over alleged Prince Andrew cover-up claims. pic.twitter.com/L36yepDzEh

— Feminegra (@feminegra) January 20, 2026

Coverage focused on the disruption and the security response. Outlets described a rare breach of the usual royal script. The optics told a different story. This was not a random outburst. The questions were specific, current, and rooted in a scandal the palace insists belongs to the past.

Why Andrew Still Shadows the Waleses

The anger did not emerge in a vacuum. In October 2025, Virginia Giuffre reignited scrutiny with her memoir. She alleged that her 2019 interview detailing claims against Prince Andrew never aired after palace pressure on ABC News. The fear, she wrote, was losing access to the monarchy’s most valuable figures.

Those claims align with leaked footage recorded in August 2019 and made public that November, in which Amy Robach expressed frustration that palace pressure had derailed the story, saying the network was “threatened a million different ways.” She explained that editors hesitated because future interviews with Prince William and Kate were at risk, laying bare a calculation that prioritised royal access over airing allegations.

I’ve had the story for three years. I’ve had this interview with Virginia Roberts. We would not put it on the air. First of all, I was told, who’s Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows who that is. This is a stupid story. Then the palace found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a million different ways. We were so afraid we wouldn’t be able to interview Kate and Will that also quashed the story. – Amy Robach

In 2023, William and Kate were photographed on a family outing with Prince Andrew at Balmoral, a moment widely circulated as unity despite his withdrawal from public duties. That same year, commentators claimed the Waleses would prefer Andrew as a neighbour over Harry and Meghan. Those flashes of proximity have lingered in public memory.

Polls, Power, and Protest

The heckling cuts through a long-standing narrative that polling strength shields the Prince and Princess of Wales from public anger, because, despite consistently positive survey results, frustration surfaced openly in Scotland and attached itself to unresolved questions about Andrew rather than familiar media scapegoats. The contrast is striking, particularly when set against Prince Harry’s recent court appearances, which have passed with largely calm receptions even as commentary continues to frame him as unpopular, exposing a growing gap between headline polling and lived public response.

Embed from Getty Images

Prince Harry arrives at the Royal Courts of Justice as claimants sue Daily Mail publisher over alleged unlawful information gathering spanning 1993 to 2011.

The police intervention added another dimension, with officers warning protesters about arrest despite the fact that modern cases of royal heckling rarely result in convictions, a reality underscored by the historical record showing the last successful prosecution dating back to 1796. Contemporary arrests tend to dissolve once media attention fades, creating a deterrent effect that suppresses dissent without delivering legal resolution, and reinforcing the perception that control rather than accountability remains the priority.

William’s apparent strategy of avoiding hostile tabloids while his brother confronts them in court has done little to quiet these frustrations, because the public questions raised in Scotland spoke directly to years of image management and selective protection. The tone was blunt because patience has worn thin, and the palace’s preference for managing appearances over addressing substance has left a vacuum that public anger is now filling.