In the days following the latest tranche of Epstein disclosures, coverage of the former Prince, now disgracafuly styled Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, has taken a noticeably therapeutic turn. Reports of strain, shock and emotional fragility have begun to eclipse the substance of the documents themselves. At the centre of that shift is Sarah Ferguson.
Both the Daily Mail and The Telegraph report that the former Duchess of York sought treatment at one of the world’s most exclusive wellness clinics in Zurich. The timing is not incidental.
The Telegraph framed her stay as a direct response to the renewed scrutiny:
“Sarah Ferguson checked into one of the world’s most expensive wellness clinics after the Epstein scandal broke, it has been reported. Ms Ferguson, the former wife of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, is understood to have booked a stay at the £13,000-a-day Paracelsus Recovery Clinic in Zurich, Switzerland…Another said she was ‘absolutely crushed’ when email exchanges between her and Jeffrey Epstein were made public, adding: ‘Sarah has built up a strong relationship with Paracelsus, so it was the obvious place for her to get away from everything.’
The lakeside clinic offers a series of month-long recovery programmes and has 15 medical experts. Clients have access to a chauffeur and private chef.”
The Daily Mail used stronger language but followed the same structure:
“Sarah Ferguson checked herself into the most expensive wellness clinic in the world as details about her close friendship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein ruined her, the Daily Mail can reveal…The former Duchess of York, 66, fled the UK as she and her ex-husband became embroiled in the growing Epstein scandal which culminated in his arrest on Thursday…Fergie secretly took refuge in the world-renowned £13,000-a-day Paracelsus Recovery Clinic in Zurich, Switzerland, over a month ago. A Swiss source told the Daily Mail: ‘Sarah left for Zurich just after Christmas, and stayed until the end of January. She always feels at home at Paracelsus, and knows she’ll get love and attention there, as well as expert health treatment when she’s feeling at her most vulnerable.’”
The overlap is clear. In both accounts, the scandal breaks, the Duchess is described as “absolutely crushed”, and she retreats to a “sanctuary” offering privacy, discretion and five-star care. The clinic’s fees are equally foregrounded: £13,000 a day, up to £350,000 for a month-long stay.
What is less emphasised in these sympathetic depictions is the substance of the material that triggered the distress. The released emails showed that Ferguson maintained contact with Jeffrey Epstein after his conviction, sought assistance with her debts, and, according to the documents, visited him with her daughters shortly after his release. Those details remain central to the public concern.
Related Stories
In the week the Epstein material resurfaced, coverage shifted quickly to the York family’s emotional state. Reports spoke of strain and anxiety. Commentators described Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie as shocked. Broadcasters replayed and widely amplified Prince William’s pre-recorded BBC Radio 1 interview on resilience. The headlines in the image above make the pivot clear. Coverage shifted from the revelations themselves to how those involved were coping.
Mental health should be taken seriously. Public figures are not immune to pressure. But there is a difference between acknowledging distress and centring it. When words like refuge, sanctuary and vulnerability dominate, the narrative changes. The emphasis moves from conduct to consequences, from decisions to discomfort.
Then there is the cost. A five-week stay at Paracelsus would approach half a million pounds. For someone long associated with financial instability, that is not a small detail. Who paid. Neither outlet provides a clear answer. The price is printed, and yet the funding is not explained.

Sarah Ferguson has long moved between public sympathy and private controversy. She has often appeared to live beyond what she claims she can afford. In royal circles, being “short of funds” rarely means real hardship. It usually means credit is tightening, not that resources have disappeared.
When Philip Schofield faced serious allegations, concern for his mental health quickly dominated coverage. Now, amid Epstein fallout, similar language surrounds Andrew and Ferguson. Manufactured narratives of mental health concerns should not soften the story, and they won’t erase the record. At some point, the focus returns to the choices that created the crisis.
Discover more from Feminegra
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

These people really are shameless predators. There is no end to the grift and grotesque PR spin they will practice on the public, while abusing anyone they like in private.
I will be utterly unsurprised when it finally emerges that Sarah was a procurement agent for Epstein.
Reportedly she was homeless, destitute and jobless, needed to find work to live from day to day.
Let’s say the quiet part out loud 📢 who is paying for that? 🤭
Reportedly she was homeless, destitute and jobless, needed to find work to live from day to day.
Let’s say the quiet part out loud 📢 who is paying for that? 🤭