The National Park Service (NPS) has quietly reversed controversial edits to its Underground Railroad webpage following a wave of public backlash and media scrutiny. The agency restored Harriet Tubman’s image and quote, along with key references to slavery and resistance that it had previously removed from the site earlier this year.
The updated version reinstates Tubman’s portrait at the top of the page and reintroduces language that defines the Underground Railroad as a bold act of escape from bondage, rather than a sanitized symbol of national unity. These changes come in response to mounting criticism from historians, civil rights leaders, and cultural commentators who accused the agency of whitewashing history.
Leaders Did Not Approve the Website Edits
The National Park Service confirmed that no agency or department leaders had approved the Underground Railroad webpage edits. Once staff discovered the changes, they acted swiftly to restore the page. The agency described the deletions as “concerning” and clarified that they did not reflect its values or oversight process.
Moreover, two NPS employees told the reporters that political appointees under the Trump administration had pressured career staff to flag DEI-related pages for review. While no one has claimed responsibility for the final edits, the revised language mirrored efforts seen across other federal websites—many of which downplayed slavery and resistance by Black Americans.
What the Deleted Content Tried to Erase
The earlier edit removed Tubman’s image and voice entirely. In her place, a collage of U.S. Postal Service stamps celebrating “Black and white cooperation” was added. The new text also reframed the Underground Railroad as a symbol of unity, rather than an act of resistance against slavery.
Mentions of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 disappeared. Officials removed a mural of the 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment, the first Black regiment raised in the North during the Civil War. Additionally, image cards depicting enslaved people fighting for freedom were deleted. However, all of these elements have now been fully restored.
Critics say the deletions were not mistakes. In fact, they were strategic. Civil rights attorney Ben Crump described the edit as an attempt to diminish Tubman’s legacy and erase the resistance of enslaved people. Likewise, Bernice King, daughter of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., called the changes “an attack on truth” and a refusal to face historical injustice.
An attack on truth, an attempt to erase history that would help us improve society today, a refusal to be uncomfortable and engaged in changing harmful policies and practices… #HarrietTubman pic.twitter.com/QhH5AwNAjE
— Be A King (@BerniceKing) April 7, 2025
This Is Not the First Time This Has Happened
This incident fits a broader pattern. Over the past year, government websites across departments have quietly removed or reworded content tied to American racism and injustice. The Department of Defense, for example, recently admitted to deleting a page on Jackie Robinson’s Army service. Officials restored that page only after public pressure mounted.
At the Smithsonian, President Trump ordered a review of museum exhibits he claims promote “improper ideology.” Meanwhile, Vice President JD Vance is overseeing a government-wide purge of DEI-aligned content. A recent report revealed that the NPS also deleted a page on Benjamin Franklin’s views on slavery and erased references to historic figures who enslaved others.
As a result, concerns about political influence shaping federal history pages continue to grow.
Why Harriet Tubman’s Story Matters Now
Harriet Tubman is more than a historical figure. She risked her life to lead enslaved people to freedom. Her story is inseparable from the brutality of American slavery. Erasing her from the Underground Railroad webpage strips away the human cost of bondage and resistance.
Fortunately, the National Park Service has restored the page to its original version, including Tubman’s image, her quote, and the full historical context. The agency says it remains committed to telling “complex and challenging historical narratives.” Still, many now question how strong that commitment truly is.
Ultimately, this controversy was never just about a webpage. It was a test of memory and accountability—of what America chooses to remember and what it still tries to forget.
Discover more from Feminegra
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
