Royal fashion used to be sold as a fairy tale of instant success for the fashion outlet. Wear a coat, carry a bag, and a struggling label would supposedly bloom overnight. That narrative worked for years because the press repeated it often enough. Yet the record now tells a different story. Multiple British brands linked to Kate Middleton have since faced administration, layoffs, or quiet closures, while the myth of a guaranteed commercial boost continues to circulate as if nothing changed.
At the same time, accusations that Kate’s wardrobe mirrors Meghan Sussex’s style are no longer whispers confined to fan forums. Side-by-side comparisons, stylist follow lists, and documented timelines have filled social feeds and previous reporting alike. The pattern has been noted repeatedly, not as gossip but as an observable sequence. Meghan wears it first, headlines follow, and months later, a similar silhouette appears elsewhere with a new credit attached.
What makes the current moment sharper is the media pivot now unfolding. As the once celebrated “Kate effect” struggles to match its reputation, coverage increasingly links her to brands that Meghan originally elevated. Media outlets push shoe labels and handbags that Meghan spotlighted back into the news with new captions and recycled praise, editing the origin story in real time. The result is a rebranding exercise designed to keep an inflated legacy afloat, even when the receipts suggest another author wrote the first draft.
The Brands Meghan Elevated First
In 2018, several smaller fashion labels experienced sudden global exposure after Meghan wore their pieces during official visits. Founders openly credited her influence with job growth, factory expansion, and months of back orders. These were not vague impressions. They were measurable outcomes shared in interviews and financial reports. The language used by business owners often sounded emotional because the impact felt immediate and life-changing for local workers.
Meghan later explained that she viewed clothing as a quiet form of advocacy. She chose brands with purpose or strong female leadership, and she understood the ripple effect her wardrobe could create. That philosophy resonated with audiences who saw her fashion choices as intentional rather than decorative. The narrative around her style, therefore, is linked directly to support for small businesses, not just aesthetics.
When those very same brands resurface years later on Kate Middleton’s royal calendar, many observers do not view it as a fresh discovery. They see a pattern they have already watched unfold. The original spotlight is still traceable.
Media Framing and the Rise of the Kate effect
Mainstream outlets now describe a polished commercial surge tied to Kate Middleton with striking confidence. Headlines celebrate revenue jumps, international sales, and heritage branding as if each handbag appearance begins a new chapter rather than continuing an existing one. The language leans heavily on stability and tradition, presenting her influence as dependable consolidation instead of fresh discovery. That framing becomes especially noticeable when it arrives alongside glowing financial statistics and carefully selected timelines.
Designed in Edinburgh, made in Spain and carried on the world stage. The Scottish husband and wife founders behind the Princess of Wales’s favourite handbag brand are celebrating record results, thanks to the ‘Kate effect’. Strathberry … posted 35 per cent year-on-year growth and revenue of £36.4 million in 2025. Pre-Christmas trading in November and December last year also increased by 58 per cent. Whenever a royal carries one of our bags, we see a surge of interest from around the world,’ co-founder Leeanne Hundleby told The Times. ‘It has such a positive impact at home too. We’re delighted to fly the flag for a contemporary Scotland.… The princess carried the brand’s £295 Multrees chain wallet at the Order of the Garter ceremony last year (and in 2023) as well as its £425 Mosaic Nano style at her annual Christmas carol concert in 2024. The Duchess of Sussex and the Duchess of Edinburgh have also been photographed with Strathberry bags in recent years.… The Princess of Wales’s capacity to shift stock for the brands she wears is well known. High street brands such as Reiss and Zara regularly sell out of items within hours of an appearance…” – The Times
The Times provided a textbook example of how this narrative now works. The article praised Strathberry’s record growth and confidently stamped it with the “Kate effect,” complete with tidy revenue percentages and glowing language about global demand. Meghan’s prior visibility with the same brand received a single passing mention, almost like fine print. The spotlight stayed fixed on the present endorsement, while the origin story slipped into the margins. Writers stack impressive numbers beside a royal title often enough and expect the audience to forget who drew attention to the label in the first place.
The irony becomes sharper when set against Prince Harry’s own recollection in Spare. He described a 2018 meeting where Kate believed Meghan wanted access to her fashion contacts, only for Harry to point out that Meghan already had her own industry network. Fast forward a few years, and the coverage now treats brands first worn by Meghan as fresh discoveries under Kate’s schedule, with commercial credit reassigned as if timelines are optional. To critics, this does not read like balanced reporting. It reads like selective memory dressed up as journalism, where headlines and omissions quietly rewrite who actually opened the door and who simply walked through it later.
Related Stories
Public Reaction and the Copying Debate
The public record is clear. Strathberry did not enter the royal fashion conversation through Kate Middleton. It entered through Meghan Sussex in 2017, during her earliest official engagements, when international outlets ran wave after wave of features about a small Scottish handbag label suddenly selling out. Those articles highlighted Meghan’s appearance, the craftsmanship of the bags, and the strong price-to-quality value compared with higher-end luxury brands. The same pattern appears with many other fashion brands. For example, Meghan had worn Aquazzura heels for years before Kate began to step out in the identical Bow Tie styles. Anyone can search the archived timeline and verify the sequence, yet media coverage still presents later appearances as the starting point instead of the follow-up.
What we are criticising is the way sections of the British media now write as if that earlier exposure never existed. Recent headlines frequently frame Strathberry’s growth around Kate’s appearances while reducing Meghan’s role to a brief line or omitting it entirely. The brand’s own founders have spoken in general terms about the impact of “a royal” carrying their bags, yet writers repeatedly attach the commercial narrative to Kate by name. This is an editorial choice.
Credit is being shifted in plain sight. The sequence shows Meghan first, documented by years of coverage, followed later by Kate receiving the bulk of current praise. When journalists present that later moment as the origin rather than the continuation, they are not just reporting fashion. They are rewriting the timeline, and they are doing it to protect and inflate Kate Middleton’s image despite the existing record.
Discover more from Feminegra
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Well, of course, they lie about everything!
The reason Ms. Markle received only a slight mention is because she only served as a working member of the The Firm for less than two years. She was a blip. Princess Catherine has been performing royal duties for well over a dozen years. Markle was new kid on the block but didn’t have staying power. People don’t care what someone did or what they wore in 2017!!! That’s almost ten years ago, who gives a rip. It’s 2026, move on with your life and join us in the present day. Stop clinging to decades old grievances.
Ms. SUSSEX has enough staying before meeting Harry, and being seen at various fashion shows BEFORE stepping foot on Saltine island. The colonizer always copy the originator. It’s 2026 and it’s time to admit that rewriting history is failing
Calling what the royals do “work” is hilarious. And kate especially who does some of the lowest engagements than the rest of them. Meghan and her husband were bullied out of that vile family because they were more popular and Willileaks and Kate couldn’t have that. Worked out for the best Meghan and Harry are free to pursue causes and business interests they care about..and people like you can talk up mumbling kate all you want but the lady can hardly string two sentences together let alone do any so called “work” with any impact and as for her husband what has he done? Nothing..nada
You forgot to call me a bot and accuse me of being paid by the BRF.
You are so right and it needs to be understood by people that the royals are using their vast wealth, influence and power to sell a compleftely false narrative in an attempt to save their crumbling empire.
Don’t think you are a bot but I do think you should direct your continuous critical commentary towards other members of that family who are doing more damage to the reputation of the monarchy as we speak. Andrew and Fergie are just the tip of the iceberg. How does a prince with tax payer funded royal protection manage to be enmeshed in a sex trafficking pedo ring and the palace including the late queen, the current king and william not knowing about it. Or what about all the women that were coming and going from the royal lodge? No one knew nothing? Yet meghan and harry are the problem me think you need to open your eyes and see the people you are supporting and defending have questionable morals.
Deary me i can assure I do not feel any hatred for the tax payer funded royals ..just disgust at their hypocrisy for not standing up, defending or protecting Harry and Meghan at any stage. Taking away their security at a criticital time putting them at risk of harm was unforgivable esp after Harry’s mum was unalived by tabloid vultures. Yet Andrew is still is protected with housing and security they are pathetic as are you for defending such immoral bunch of hypocritical grifters.
Did this article mention Andrew? Why are you obsessed with him?? No ones talking about him except you. He’s as irrelevant as Meghan and Harry so move along please… Catherine and William have the spotlight now. Cry your eyes out, but it won’t change the truth.
You are confusing facts with grievance. Facts are being presented here. The Duchess of Sussex has staying power as all she wears sells out, and the brands she wears increase in visibility and sales. The Duchess also remains in the headlines around the world, which shows she is hardly a blip.
Oh yes indeed Markle remains in the headlines 😂😂😂 Not the kind of headlines she pays to have written about her though!! Poor thing…..
Sorry but Markle was a just blip in the royal family and has since been relegated to the Kathy Griffin section of Yahoo’s D-list along with Andrew and Fergie.
Be assured the lies, distortions and botnet activity will continue throughout the knee-bending rota tabloids, british press and social media. The monarchy has been as exposed as a beached whale gasping for help as it tries to appear benevolent and relevant.
Kate’s fecklessness and rumoured unhappy marriage have to be offset by endless praise for non-existent achievements. What little confidence she had was destroyed by a talented and articulate Meghan and is why they will continue trying to destroy Meg while secretly worshipping at her altar. Meghan, like a bird sitting in a tree, is never afraid that the branch will break because her trust is not in the branch, but in her own wings while Kate hides behind a load of psychobabble on “Coming to peace with our tears and discover what it means to be alive and to be at one with nature, a quiet teacher and a soft voice that guides”. Please!
Do not lecture me about who I should or should not criticize in The Firm. It’s obvious you hate ALL of them except Harry and Markle. Your hatred is what I’m calling out. Deal with it.
Nothing like a deranger screaming into the void. Clearly, you are not ok. Harry fell in love with Meghan, they were driven out, and have moved on with their lives. Yet, the obsession of her continues. Seems no one picked you and that enrages you. Sending a hug.
Troll farmers are recognisable by their repeated use of certain phrases such as ‘lecturing’ ‘your hate ‘ (but never theirs!) rudely addressing Meghan and ending with the self-important command “deal with it”. It is part of a repetitive, robotic process unable to enter rational discussion. but hoping to get an angry response to generate yet more trash input for the troll farm bosses.
She’s going to be the queen and cannot look like the lazy cow that she is, so steal someone else’s work!
Oscar Wilde has been attributed with this quote 👉”imitation is the sincerest form of flattery”. In other words, it implies admiration and respect for the accomplishments, personal style and mannerisms being copied.
Conversely, it can be one or all of the following:
✓a lack of originality
✓highlight mediocrity
✓passive aggressive behaviour
I would like to ‘LIKE’ but never find the LIKE button as others seem to so here you are!
Kate Middleton is a substandard woman who married into a family of pedophiles and rapists and made it known that she’d MUCH RATHER live next to Andrew than Meghan.
Kate Middleton will NEVER outrun the allegations that she’s a racist.
After all, the HARDEST thing that lazy b**ch EVER had to do was walk beside a Black woman that she lied about, lying that she had been made to cry.
The ridiculous bots and derangers that support Kate Middleton ALSO support pedophiles, rapists,racists and gifters. They sound increasingly desperate and pathetic trying to prop up one of the world’s LAZIEST and less intelligent people. They try so hard to make her seem smart and it just fails every time.
MEGHAN HRH DUCHESS of SUSSEX, Princess of Nigerian realm, American patriot,
humanitarian, actress, model, calligrapher
global style icon, female empowerment activist, creater and presenter of award winning podcasts, author, founder, entrepreneur, executive producer of documentaries, eloquent speaker, daughter, mother, wife, etc, etc!
The insecurity of the prospective future queen of England, stems from her being fully aware that she cannot compete with greatness, or even attain a fraction of this level of accomplishments.
Irrespective of the curated PR impersonations in dress and footwear, it is futile to repeatedly attempt “to make a silk purse from a sow’s ear”.
A brilliant YouTube content creator, has been showcasing small aspects of Meghan’s Charity work, long before meeting HRH Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex.
See Link below:
https://youtube.com/shorts/UFk7QJOLL24?si=OfSw07IL_JfTMC-G
“DOING CHARITY WORK WITH THE US MILITARY BEFORE MEETING PRINCE HARRY | 2014 USO TOUR”‼️
The harder you try propping up the Markle brand, the more you reveal your own envy of William and Catherine’s genuine love and affection for each other, their family, and their country. What they have is real, what Markle has is fake, stolen, manufactured, and copied. Everyone knows so here you are pressing the panic button because her popularity is at the bottom with Andrew and Fergie.
The insecurity of the former Duchess who left the The Firm with her panties in a twist, stems from her being fully aware of she cannot compete with genuine authentic warmth and compassion or attain even a fraction of their stature on the world stage….
But keep deluding yourselves if it makes you feel better.
And the more you continue to be a tabloid headline reader and believer you will continue to be a dog chasing after it’s on tail. I’ve yet to see a person who loves Catherine and William explain to me why you think you never heard anything negative about Meghan before she married into the Royal Mafia Cult Family. Why do you think Catherine gets praised and Meghan gets pulverized for doing THE EXACT same thing: Avocado gate Baby bump gate, Wedding Chappel Candle Gate, so on and so on. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal Go check it out yourself and please explain why when Catherine wore her hair up it was fabulous, but when Meghan did it she was breaking Royal Protocol? I would like a reasonable explanation rational explanation please and thank you!
I think it’s reasonable and rational to point out that BOTH Catherine and Meghan get criticized for any and everything under the sun. Why? Because they are public figures. Name a single public figure who ISN’T criticized on a regular basis. You can’t. What you seem to be so sensitive about is likability… Princess Catherine is more gentle, serene, and likable than Meghan and it shows in the public reactions to her duties and charities she supports. If Ms. Markle weren’t so whiny and complaining, perhaps she would get less criticism.
You didn’t answer my question. Catherine got nasty press too, for sure! It was morbidly unfair and mean. Catherine is considered ‘middleclass’ compared to the RF. She got called Waity-Kaity, mean things from the press. However, while Catherine experienced her own negative press, I agree- they all have. Here’s the difference, which you likely don’t see or want to admit; Meghan’s was/is racial with either outright, virtual signaling, or troupes. There was a picture of two people with a monkey saying it was Harry and Meghan with Baby Archie. Headlines that Read: ‘Niggling’ feeling, Almost Straight outta Compton, Exotic DNA.” Bad press started in 2016 for Meghan before the Oprah interview and the book Spare. This is not just about Meghan v. Catherine. I am not one that relished or laughed when Catherine got bad press or made fun of. I didn’t mention this before; I had the pleasure of meeting Meghan’s MUA Daniel. I met him before Meghan met Harry. I was a Suit’s watcher, so I was a bit struck by meeting Daniel. He said she is one of the nicest people you will ever meet. No one that has ever met her has said anything bad about her. I started donating/volunteering to food banks because of her. You don’t have to like her, she doesn’t know you, you her. But it the reason you don’t like her is because of media gaslighting, jealousy? You should ask yourself; do I believe the media or press when something bad or negative is said about Catherine the same way I do Meghan? Which brings me back to my original question; why does the media praise Catherine and slam Meghan for doing the EXACT SAME THING? I’ll wait…
Thank you for a very articulate and thoughtful response. I’ll do my best:
Tabloid media is trash… I have no response to the garbage they put out about either Catherine or Meghan. The coverage of both ladies is equally repulsive and reprehensible. Trash is trash, whether it includes race or not. There’s nothing to be gained having an argument over which trash is worse.
The establishment media is a different animal… Trust me, I’m no expert but I’ll hazard a guess: Catherine understands the “give and take” aspect of media relations better than Meghan. She allows limited access to her family and children, on her terms, at certain times. Meghan refuses access to her family under ANY conditions or any terms. So the establishment media plays its little game of “get backs.”
If you choose to be in the public eye, sometimes you have to make allowances for access to the media…If it’s a two way street- you’ll stand a better chance getting SOME (not all) favorable coverage. I hope that answers your question.
Tabloid media is trash… I have no response to the garbage they put out about either Catherine or Meghan. The coverage of both ladies is equally repulsive and reprehensible. Trash is trash, whether it includes race or not. There’s nothing to be gained having an argument over which trash is worse. (Yes, I agree strongly with the media being trash. However, this trash Media puts Catherine in a positive light and Meghan in a unfavorable light which has strongly influenced public opinion. It’s called; ‘Media Gaslighting.’ If you repeat something enough, people will start to believe. The media knows this. This is an old tactic they’ve used and it works, so much so that it has impacted elections. Also, something you didn’t answer was the vitriolic race component. Catherine never had to deal with that. Again, something you wouldn’t understand or learn to understand. Not one single person that has accused her of being a ‘bully’ or horrible person have we seen with our eyes or even a name yet this ‘bully’ title is a mere allegation but people take it as gospel. Despite the fact that several people with names, faces, have stepped forward and have nothing but glowing things to say about her. ( Serena Williams, Entire star cast of Suits, support staff (they are the ones that stated that Meghan went out of her way to see to it that the food on sets got donated to Food banks and shelters and that she did the foot/paper work to see to it that this could happen.) The actor Simon Rex; British Media offered top pay him money to lie and say they slept together. Being the integral person he is, he refused! Gwen Paltrow shut nasty rumors down also. I’m not sure at what point we as a society stopped believe real people but believe lies from unseen ‘sources.’)
“Trust me, I’m no expert but I’ll hazard a guess: Catherine understands the “give and take” aspect of media relations better than Meghan. She allows limited access to her family and children, on her terms, at certain times. Meghan refuses access to her family under ANY conditions or any terms. So the establishment media plays its little game of “get backs.”
(I strongly disagree with this. I’ll go back to the vitriolic racial press Meghan received not to mention death threats made to her and her son Prince Archie by Tyrone Patten Walsh & Christopher Gibbons who are in jail until this day. Even after this happened, the firm, nor the Royal Family stepped in to speak out about this liable threat or the obvious horrid press. Met Police assistant commissioner Neil Basu said danger posed would have left the Duchess of Sussex feeling “under threat all of the time”. Just a friendly reminder, this was before Harry wrote Spare and interview. Also, people speak about how Harry wrote about his combat unalivings when in actuality, the British Media didn’t just write about this several times but basically brag about it! The British media will deliberately omit information and spin things and create news by sensationalizing and out right lying.
If you choose to be in the public eye, sometimes you have to make allowances for access to the media…If it’s a two way street- you’ll stand a better chance getting SOME (not all) favorable coverage. I hope that answers your question.
(I strongly disagree with this statement. Meghan explains this very thing to Oprah She said: ‘I never thought this would be easy, but I thought it would be fair. ‘’My regret is believing them when they said I would be protected. I believed that.’’ It was never a ‘two-way’ street for her, she didn’t have that luxury. The simple fact that she gets treated worse than and more bad press than Andrew says everything. So much so, The female members of Parliament, led by Holly Lynch, have publicly supported Meghan Markle by signing an open letter. This letter, co-signed by 72 female MPs from all political parties, condemned the unfair media scrutiny and called out outdated and colonial undertones in the stories about the Duchess of Sussex. The MPs expressed their solidarity with Meghan, stating that the media’s treatment of her has been invasive and misleading. They emphasized the importance of media integrity and the right to privacy, urging the national media to respect these values. The letter was a significant act of solidarity, reflecting the growing support for Meghan Markle amidst the challenges she faces due to the media’s relentless scrutiny. The true fact is this weather you want to admit it or not; Harry and Meghan both told us everything we needed to know. They were willing to lie to protect others (William Prince Harry has publicly stated that he did not agree with a statement made in his name regarding allegations of bullying by Prince William. He emphasized that he was not consulted on a joint statement that was released, they were willing to lie to protect William but wouldn’t tell the truth to protect him or Meghan. Catherine: Meghan did not make her cry but it was the other way around. This lie was the catalyst of Meghan being a bully and the palace stayed silent because they were the ones that planted this lie in the first place. Meghan actually didn’t say anything negative about Catherine, she just corrected the story and said they squashed it and that Catherine is a ‘very kind person.’ And of course; Andrew: there is so much headlines: H/M were out! & Andrew was back in! William, Catherine would rather live near Andrew than Meghan and Harry, Catherine’s walkabout was the hardest thing she ever had to do, The Christmas walkabout, the church service where William and Andrew riding in the front seat with Catherine in the back! This was AFTER the Queen and then Prince Charles paid $16 million to Virginia in the civil settlement for a woman he said never met, sweat he couldn’t produce, for a picture he never took! We knew that was a lie! Charles only faux removed his titles for damage control not an act of moral authority. He is still 8th in line. He gets to live palatial gets support. Meghan and Harry was never given options such as these. Andrew is waiting for the home to be renovated (tax funded) whilst H/M paid out of their own pockets, their security was stripped from them while Andrew maintained his. All he while, the media treated Meghan, a woman who said she needed mental health and being mistreated was treated better than a Pdfphile. This was by design. It speaks volumes of what they deem valuable. They prefer optics.
You are entitled to your strongly held opinion that Meghan is treated worse in the press than Princess Catherine, but I disagree because both women are equally targeted and persecuted by the tabloids. I admire Catherine for rising above it and shining her light in this world, we need her messsge of connection and nature more than ever.
P.S.
And I would add this as well: I have no idea what “racially charged” headlines to which you are referring with regard to Ms. Markle. I have never read any racist articles about her. Regarding death threats, all members of the BRF receive them as do most public figures. William and Catherine do not draw attention nor seek sympathy for themselves over it.
You see what you want to see. I told you that People were actually arrested and Basir said all get threats but theirs were higher. Again, people like you and subjects like these are impasse. Even a white substance was sent to them. A professional said threats were greater and higher for them as threats were made towards their children, but you STILL respond the way you do. You have what Harry calls: ‘unconscienced bias’ I’m telling you as a bi-racial female what is racial and what is not. This mind set is why the world is going to hell on a scholarship. Only God can fix willful ignorance. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/meghan-markle-faced-serious-and-credible-threats-to-her-life-senior-met-officer-says_uk_638683f9e4b082d8e6d6075f?origin=article-related-nonlife
I am well aware that both Harry & Meghan and William & Catherine receive death threats. What I was pointing out is the difference in their responses to them. W&C do not feel sorry for themselves nor seek any public sympathy or draw attention to the threats they receive.
Thank you again for your response. If my risk assessment is higher than everyone else and my security gets pulled, for me and my family, He// yeah, I am complaining. Especially when $16 million hush settlement money was paid for Prince PdfPhile and he still had security. Again, this was before Spare and interviews. Will and Catherine’s security was not pulled. Again, brick wall/impasse conversation. You don’t get it. Please don’t respond. There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.
Harry and Meghan’s risk assessment… by whom? What proof do you have and what is the source? You do not have access to a comprehensive database of ANY royal family’s threat level, so it’s not possible to compare them.
You have the right to believe whatever you wish, Tenderly, but you do NOT have the right to dictate and force your beliefs onto me or anyone else.
Especially when you have no documented proof of their veracity.
With regard to the witness who was testifying on behalf and in support of Harry and Markle, Neil Basu, his statement hardly qualifies to be a comprehensive “threat assessment” …Or can credibly be compared to The Prince and Princess of Wales whatsoever. As I said, you have zero access to any security briefings regarding senior members of BRF and have no business saying the threats made against Harry and Markle come close to what the senior members receive. Articles from HuffPost make for nice gossip but hardly qualify as documented evidence.
Neil Basu Former-Counter Terrorism Head: one of many. The Squad doesn’t just pull random stuff out of our arses btw! Do your research! I stated this before in my replies to you but you have on blinders.
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/meghan-markle-faced-serious-and-credible-threats-to-her-life-senior-met-officer-says_uk_638683f9e4b082d8e6d6075f
NO ONE is questioning that Markle received death threats. Let me repeat in case your hearing aid is turned off: EVERYONE KNOWS Markle has received threats. Period. So where does Mr. Basu list the amounts and nature of threats received by the Waleses or the Windsors? NO WHERE. You have nothing to compare them to. Zero. It’s all speculation and conjecture on your part because you have NO official documentation of any threats received by senior members of the royal family. Why? Because they don’t parade their security status to a bunch of cameras and media begging for sympathy and pity.
Prince Harry’s risk assessment was higher than that of the Queen at one point in time. This was due to his status as a working royal and his military history, which made him and his family a target. However, after stepping back from royal duties, his security was downgraded, and he was stripped of his publicly funded security. The current situation is complex, with Prince Harry’s security being assessed on a case-by-case basis, and there are concerns about the potential threats he faces due to his prior royal status and military history.
Newsweek- Please don’t respond. You are a nasty Meghan hater. I tried being respectful, but you had to be a twunt with your responses. Have the life and day you deserve.
I’m sorry you take criticism of Ms. Markle so personally. Yes, I have criticized her but you cannot find ONE hateful comment I’ve ever made. Everything I state is based upon my opinion. I have not resorted to calling you disgusting names when you offer criticism of Princess Catherine. Calling me a twunt reveals your true colors and how immature and childish you are. With regard to Harry’s security options, he’ll have to accept whatever he is graciously awarded like a man- without griping or whining publicly for pity. He would come a long way with his dreadful polling numbers if he showed some gratitude for once in his life.
Let’s start with facts. Outside of the polls that the Ho’s son puts out, Kate Middleton is not beloved. If Kate Middleton was beloved, she’d have friends. If Kate Middleton was beloved, she’d have actual fans instead of trolls and derangers. If Kate Middleton was beloved, her clothing brands would sell out instead of closing down. If she was beloved, she wouldn’t try so hard to be Diana, to be Meghan, to be Queen Mary of Denmark.
Kate Middleton is a substandard woman who only became ‘beloved’ once she became a yt supremacist saint and a stick to beat Meghan with. No one gives a 💩 about her otherwise because if they did, they’d question why she’s under 90 pounds but they’ll “she’s so perfect” her right into her grave.
Sorry Princess Catherine sends you into a petulant and angry tirade… Why are you so full of hatred? It’s not my fault our beautiful and beloved Princess of Wales is more likable than Ms. Markle. Take a walk in nature and find some inner peace.
@Liz your responses give rise to concerns about your state of mind and mental health. Why are you idol worshiping Ms Middleton, who is clearly, mediocre and simply cos playing in the role.
🤡 Take your own advice ” take a walk in nature”, it will prove therapeutic. You have demonstrated that your life is without purpose, sad, lonely, living vicariously and deluded that your rage baiting is of benefit to Ms Middleton.
Hope you get the help, soon.😊
Again, I apologize for upsetting you with the truth about our beloved and cherished Prince and Princess of Wales… Please try to let go of the hatred in your heart and do something productive and fulfilling with your energy. You may surprise yourself and stop your incessant whining and complaining about the BRF! Living in the light is a beautiful thing, just ask William and Catherine 💕
Derangers think that their hero worship of Kate Middleton somehow uplifts her but in reality, it simply proves that the only people who pay attention to her are the racists who admire a kindred spirit in Kate Middleton. Is that why Kate looked so happy in the company of Donald Trump, because she knew believes the same things she doe?
Pretending that Kate Middleton is beloved, particularly by the husband who publicly treats her as if she has horrendous body odor, is not showing people their love. It’s showing the desperation of the derangers. No amount of festive glances and loving touches can equal one dancing Instagram post from Meghan. When is the last time we saw Kate Middleton and William dancing? When’s the last time we saw William treat Kate Middleton with respect? He can’t stand her and he can’t jettison her because she had ‘cancer’. No wonder his jaw is bulging and clenched all the time.
No amount of hatred and name calling will silence people like me from voicing our support of the Prince and Princess of Wales. It takes a lot more than crude disgusting attacks to intimidate me. If you think calling me a racist will send me cowering into the corner, think again and look in the mirror- YOU are the one obsessed with skin color. The rest of society has moved on from outdated stereotypes and grievance tirades… I suggest you follow Princess Catherine’s lead and focus on something more lifegiving and meaningful… And let go of the hate in your heart. You’ll feel a lot better.
Less we forget the opportunistic grooming and emotional exploitation of a vulnerable man, by a ruthless, unaccomplished family, whose primary aim in soliciting and fostering this relationship towards marriage was to achieve gain and the elevation of social status.
Their urban jewish heritage was embraced and considered as evidence of modernization
social inclusion and acceptance of diversity by the RF.
Over the years it has become blatantly obvious that Ms Middleton is unaware/forgotten the prejudice, hate, bigotry and societal disdain,
which people from her background and heritage encountered, within living memory.
The orchestrated campaign of abuse, bigotry and hate directed at Meghan DOS is unkind, unwarranted and despicable and needs to be condemned by all rational human beings.
Less we forget the opportunistic grooming and emotional exploitation of a vulnerable man, by a ruthless, unaccomplished family, whose primary aim in soliciting and fostering this relationship towards marriage was to achieve gain and the elevation of social status.
Their urban jewish heritage was embraced and considered as evidence of modernization
social inclusion and acceptance of diversity by the RF.
Over the years it has become blatantly obvious that Ms Middleton is unaware/forgotten the prejudice, hate, bigotry and societal disdain,
which people from her background and heritage encountered, within living memory.
The orchestrated campaign of abuse, bigotry and hate directed at Meghan DOS is unkind, unwarranted and despicable and needs to be condemned by all rational human beings.
The orchestrated campaign of abuse bigotry and hate directed at Princess Catherine (a strong and courageous mother wife daughter and a cancer survivor) is unkind, unwarranted, disgusting, and despicable and IS condemned by all rational human beings…. And you will never intimidate or silence us.
The problem is that Prince George will be in the EXACT same position. The Aristo’s have closed ranks for the foreseeable future. After Diana’s treatment, they are done. They might f**k the future King but they have NOTHING to gain by marrying him or tying themselves to that family.
William KNOWS this. The only people that want ANYTHING to do with that family of racists,grifters and pedophiles are racists, grifters and pedophiles themselves. Now it’s come out that Epstein donated to one of William’s charities. William chose to protect Andrew and now it’s coming out to bite him on the ass while Meghan and Harry are peacefully dancing under their tree and ignoring that family.
Then why did Harry (the short little red head with a huge bald spot) invite a member of this pedophile-associated family (His Majesty King Charles) to attend his Invictus ceremony? Does Harry wish to be associated with pedos and racists?
Charles is the head of the armed forces in the UK although the Team Invictus UK wouldn’t know it since Charles didn’t bother to wish them good luck in 2023 or 2025. Nice try deranger but your little “whatabout” doesn’t absolve Kate Middleton of her cringing, grimacing and drawing back whenever someone Black or Brown shows up in front of her. That racist b**ch couldn’t hack it in Boston where there are barely any Black people(and they didn’t have a clue who she was) so how do they think that she’s going to ‘conquer” America later in 2026. They can’t take Kate Middleton ANYWHERE because she doesn’t know how to act. The commonwealth countries will be dropping like flies once she’s queen and she’ll be fired worse than when she was in Jamaica
Then why did the red headed member Harry invite the King to attend HIS charity event?? Why would Harry and Markle want to sit alongside a racist at Invictus?? You have no answer except to vomit your usual bile against the gracious and beautiful Princess of Wales who lives RENT FREE in your bigoted brain. Why do you hate her so much?
Charles is the head of the Armed Forces in the UK. Are you unable to read?
You SERIOUSLY need mental help.
Kate Middleton is the biggest racist in that family. It’s part of her quest to be more royal than royal. Since the Aristo’s have completely blanked “Wisteria: Doors to Manual” and refused to befriend her, she tries to out royal the true royals by being more racist than they are. Kate Middleton has not been invited to the Invictus Games since 2014, probably because of her inability to act properly around Black and Brown people. The world is becoming more multicultural and they can’t take Kate Middleton ANYWHERE because of her inability to stop cringing, grimacing and drawing back from Black and Brown people. She was literally photographed grimacing at an Asian woman just weeks ago.
So what?? What does that have to do with anything?? Is Harry legally required to invite the racist head of UK Armed Forces to attend Invictus???? Why does Harry WANT the racist pedo-associated head of the UK Armed Forces to attend?? Has he ever attended previously- NO. Why now?
So you intend to just ignore all the evidence about Kate Middleton-the subject of this article- to harp on the fact that Harry invited Charles. Harry has invited EVERY head of the armed forces in the host country to the Invictus games, including Charles in 2014. Now, we’ve answered this THREE times because Derangers aren’t the brightest(much like Kate Middleton, plus I think Derangers mimic her stpidity to try and be like her) we can move back to the subject at hand which is your stpid and racist future queen ALWAYS trying to mimic Princess Meghan.
Address that.
THANK YOU!!!
You finally answered my question… You’re totally fine with a royal “racist” attending Invictus with Harry the Hypocrite. Wow… I’m grateful yet surprised by your honest admission…. So shut your mouth about racism in the BRF, you obviously excuse it when it comes to Mr. Balding Redhead.
I’m still laughing at your question about our gorgeous Princess Catherine, you really think she copies Ms. Markle??? 😂 Catherine’s beauty comes from within, she doesn’t have to do anything except be herself and people LOVE her. Recoiling from Asians??? She’s never recoiled from anyone. Go find yourself another hobby besides trying to smear her with lies. I hear knitting is a calming and soothing activity 🧶🥰🪡