Gemma O’Neill did something unforgivable. She booked Meghan Sussex for a women’s retreat in Sydney. For that transgression, she became the focus of intense coverage across British and Australian tabloids and online commentary.

The Australian talent manager and podcaster has spent the past month facing sustained scrutiny from the media outlets and online commentators critical of Meghan Sussex. Her finances were dug into. Stories appeared about her company’s liquidation, her tax bill, and her property purchases. The framing painted her as a grifter, a fraud, someone unworthy of being in the Duchess’s orbit. Article after article rolled out, each reinforcing the same narrative, which portrayed her in a highly negative light rather than a businesswoman who hit a rough patch.

Then she disappeared from social media. And the Mail, of course, had an explanation for that too. According to them, she was “going into hiding.” Her Instagram deletion was “mysterious.” The implication, in many headlines, was that she had something to hide. Why else would she go quiet?

Here is why she went quiet. She was pregnant. And the level of online abuse she was receiving, which she says was amplified by media coverage, became so “disgusting” and “scary” that she stepped back to protect her mental health while carrying a child. Then she lost the baby.

Advertisement

The Quote They Don’t Want You to Hear

In the most recent episode of her Her Best Life podcast, Gemma broke her silence. Not to attack. Not to defend. Just to explain what happened to the people who actually care about her.

“I know you might have seen the media coverage about me recently because there have been a series of stories that have been written that are pretty hurtful and in many parts inaccurate,” she said, her voice trembling. “What’s been particularly hard is seeing assumptions being made about things, like about me apparently going quiet, but the reality was I was receiving a level of online abuse that was quite frankly disgusting and felt very scary. So I made the decision to step back from my personal Instagram to protect my mental health while I was pregnant. Since then, I’ve been going through something very personal with the loss of a baby. None of that has anything to do with me having something to hide. It was about me taking care of myself during a very difficult moment.”

Gemma O’Neill

A woman was hounded by the press and their online army while pregnant. She stepped back to protect herself and her unborn child. And then she lost that child. And the media’s response? The articles kept coming. Speculation continued without pause. Her disappearance was treated as evidence of guilt rather than the desperate act of a woman trying to survive. She is now taking legal action. She said there are “legal reasons” she cannot go into detail. That is a woman who has had enough.

A Pattern So Familiar It Makes You Sick

This story is not new. In 2020, Meghan Sussex wrote a heartbreaking op-ed for the New York Times about losing her second pregnancy. She described the moment she felt a cramp while holding Archie. She described the hospital, the silence, the grief. And she attributed the loss, in part, to the relentless media pressure she had been under.

The media responded to that op-ed with a collective shrug. Some ran stories casting doubt on her account. Others simply moved on to the next manufactured outrage. Not one outlet paused to ask whether the machine they had built, the headlines, the harassment, the daily onslaught of negativity, had contributed to the extreme stress she described during that period.

Now, six years later, the same machine has done it again. Gemma O’Neill was not a royal. She is a podcaster who booked Meghan for an event. And for that, the Daily Mail and its army of Meghan-haters decided she deserved to be destroyed.

She says she was subjected to intense coverage while pregnant. They continued while she was grieving. And they are still writing stories about her today, framing her miscarriage as a footnote to her financial troubles, as if the two are unrelated, as if the months of abuse had nothing to do with the stress that may have contributed to her loss.

This points to a pattern of intense, targeted online harassment, where individuals face sustained attacks after being linked to Meghan Sussex, with both women describing periods of heightened stress under relentless public scrutiny.

What Gemma Said About the Retreat

Despite everything, despite the abuse, despite the loss, Gemma announced that the Her Best Life retreat with Meghan will go ahead as planned. It takes place from April 17 to 19 in Sydney. And she is looking forward to it.

“Honestly, with how I’m feeling right now, I really can’t think of anything more special than being in a room with our community,” she said. “Because our community are the most beautiful, warm, loving, friendly, fun group of people. That’s something I feel like I’m going to need in my life in a few weeks.”

She also spoke about Meghan directly: “I have been in awe of how she handles all of the public scrutiny she receives as well. So there is a lot I want to ask her.”

There is something profound in that. A woman who has just been put through the same meat grinder that Meghan has endured for years is not running away. She is not hiding. She is looking forward to being in a room with the one person who understands exactly what she has been through. That is what solidarity and resilience look like. And it is the only thing the media cannot destroy.

Final Thoughts

The media loves to bully women. And when those women lose pregnancies, when they break, when they retreat from public life, the media moves on to the next target without a second thought.

Meghan lost a baby in 2020. The media kept writing. Gemma lost a baby in 2026. The media kept writing. How many more women have to lose children before someone calls this what it is? Stochastic terrorism. Harassment designed to destroy. A machine that consumes anyone who gets too close to Meghan Sussex.

Gemma O’Neill is taking legal action. She said there are legal reasons she cannot go into detail. Let us hope those legal reasons result in consequences. Because the people who did this to her, the outlets that published the stories, the trolls who sent the abuse, the editors who approved the headlines, they are not journalists. They are not commentators. They are accessories to something far darker.

Accountability must come. For once, it should land where it belongs. Gemma deserves it. So does Meghan. Every woman this machine has destroyed deserves it too.

Advertisement

Discover more from Feminegra

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.