Keir Starmer stood on that street two years ago and called it the proudest moment of his life. A new Labour government. The first in fourteen years. Today, he stood on that same street to announce he was stepping down.
His resignation speech was vintage Starmer: earnest, self-congratulatory, and utterly blind to the political corpse he leaves behind. He listed achievements, economic growth, NHS waiting lists falling, workers’ rights improving, and he’s not wrong about the facts. There were real wins.
But he missed the point entirely. Because Starmer’s premiership was never about whether he could deliver policy. It was about whether he could survive the Labour right’s obsession with internal control, and whether his own side would ever let him govern.
The answer, as we now know, was no.
“Walking up this street two years ago was the proudest moment of my life. Six years ago, I inherited a Labour Party that was politically, financially and morally bankrupt. But we changed our party. Ripping out the poison of antisemitism, restoring trust on the economy, defence, and national security. And look at what we’ve achieved in just two years. An economy that is stronger, growing faster than our peers. The fastest fall in NHS waiting lists for 17 years. The biggest improvement in rights for workers and renters in a generation. Half a million children being lifted out of poverty.
The question my party is asking now is whether I am best placed to lead us into the next general election. I have heard the answer of my parliamentary party to that question. And I accept that answer with good grace. I will resign as leader of the Labour Party. I will remain in post as Prime Minister until the contest is complete. And I will do everything I can to ensure an orderly handover of power. I shall spend more time on the most important job. Being the best husband I can to my fantastic wife, Vic. And being the best dad I can to my beautiful children.”
BBC
His speech thanked his colleagues, his staff, and his family. He didn’t mention the Labour right that helped engineer his rise, shaped his inner circle, and later turned against him. He didn’t mention the factionalism that made his party uniquely inward-facing. And he definitely didn’t mention that “owning the left” is not a strategy for governing, it’s a strategy for self-destruction.
Final Thoughts
Starmer’s resignation speech may be remembered for the achievements he listed, and to be fair, he wasn’t wrong about them. There were genuine wins. But the speech should also be remembered for what he conspicuously left out, because those omissions tell the real story.
Most notably, he failed to mention the Labour right who put him in power and then, predictably, ate him alive. Beyond that, he said nothing about the factionalism that made his party almost uniquely ungovernable, nor did he acknowledge that “owning the left” was never a political strategy but rather a recipe for self-destruction. And perhaps most tellingly, he never addressed the sheer irony of his situation: a man with no politics of his own, controlled by a faction that had no plan for governing, somehow managed to deliver more than anyone gave him credit for, yet received no credit whatsoever for any of it.
And therein lies the tragedy of Keir Starmer. Despite doing the work and delivering the wins, his own people ultimately buried him. When historians and commentators look back, it won’t be the workers’ rights or the nationalised railways that define his premiership; instead, it will be Gaza, winter fuel, and Peter Mandelson that stick in the public memory. The Labour right engineered his rise, and then, with equal precision, they engineered his fall. And now, having learned absolutely nothing from the experience, they will do it all over again with someone else.
What do you think? Was Starmer undone by his own faction, or did he simply fail to lead? Let us know in the comments.
Discover more from Feminegra
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.